Thursday, October 31, 2013

The Matter

The  Matter 

He looked at the body lying inert at his feet. His heartbeat was slow, strangely slow. He didn't expect that. He felt like kicking at its face, but his mind told him no. It was time to engage reason. Be disciplined. Be cool. Silence. Like before. No advance warning. Don't be a fool. He remembered his Mom had told him, "Son, you've got a brain. Use it. Say as little as you can. Don't try to impress anybody. You're insecure or something? Speak only when you're spoken to. Conserve your breath. Keep your ears open and your mind uncluttered.. Don't let people know what you think. Act. Don't threaten. Don't be too quick to get angry. Keep a cool head and warm feet."

He walked back to his car. He didn't bother to look back at the body. What was done, was done. It was time to move on. He drove out of the park, turned right, and two minutes got into a feeder lane to I-15 N, back to Vegas. 

She flew into a rage

She flew into a rage

She flew into a rage
Like a wild beast in a cage.
She sunk into the blame game.
She called me all the ugly names.
Once she told me that she was a born lady;
Now she acted like a mad monkey,
Screaming, foaming at the mouth like a rabid dog.
I had to say I was truly shocked.
Maybe she just acted as a Crazy Queen
In this evening of Halloween

Wissai
October 31, 2013

Set Fire to the Rain

Set Fire To The Rain

Adapted from Adele's "Set Fire to the Rain"

Once, a long time ago
I let my heart show
And I let it fall for you
But one thing I never knew

My hands were strong
But my knees were weak
Without you, I felt wrong
And couldn't stand on my feet

There was a side of you
I never, never knew
All the things you'd say
They were never, never true

All the games to me you'd play
You'd always, always win
You kept me under your sway
And you didn't think that was a sin

One day I set fire to the rain
Watched it pour as I thought of your face
It burned while I cried
As it screamed for my name

Yes, I set fire to the rain
And threw both of us into the flame 
I felt something inside me die 
Since I no longer feel the same

Sometimes I wake up on the floor
I feel smoke, I feel rain
You're with me no more
Yet I still scream for your name

Wissai
May 5, 2013

Language and Philosophy and Poetry

Language and Philosophy and Poetry

You cannot do philosophy and poetry if you are not gifted with language because language is a tool with which you think and reason in philosophy and express yourself in poetry. If a human who has  no interest in philosophy and/or cannot write poetry, that means that person is not too smart or perhaps just downright stupid like the two bitches VAW and JAW who in the last few days have revealed their true nature. They are nobodies but fancy that they are women of substance. Some people just have to lie to themselves so they can live. Those people cannot tackle philosophy because they have to be honest when they do philosophy. And they are not with themselves and others. Truths are glaring and unforgiving, especially real, hard truths. 

Wittgenstein and I

Wittgenstein, Truths, God, Fools, and I

From my recollection, Albert Camus opened his book Le Mythe de Sisyphe with an arresting thought which hit me like a sledgehammer when I first came across it. The thought is that there's only one truly philosophical question and that is suicide, i.e., to determine if life is worth living; other questions like the existence of God and if the earth is a sphere, etc.,, are of secondary importance. Of course, many others would beg to differ with Camus, but they are not philosophers cum novelists cum essayists cum playwrights cum freedom fighters, as Camus was. To them, the question of God is of supreme and cardinal importance or they so claim, but I seriously doubt their sincerity based on the way they conduct themselves. But I have no doubt of Muhammad's sincerity. I always wonder, however, if Muhammad had been a man of learning and his mind had not been contaminated by being exposed to the prevailing Jewish and Christian thoughts around him, and if he had known that there was some element of atheism in some strain of Judaism, in some early Greek thought around one thousand years before his times, and in Buddhism, would he have fancied that he was visited by the archangel Gabriel and he was receiving revelations from God? I am not saying the religion he founded was not an improvement over Christianity and Judaism in terms of social egalitarianism, and more sensible interpretations of the Biblical scriptures, the nature of God and the notion of Trinity. I am saying the religious landscape in the world today would look different. Anyway, I think Muhammad was grappling with existential questions and came to a predictable but sensible conclusion, given the intellectual tools available to him. 

I, too, was struggling with existential questions, but I was lucky to be born in the 20th century and my parents were well off enough to send me to school. Still, amazingly enough, I proudly am going on record one more time that when I was about eleven years of age, I stopped believing in a Personal God to whom I could pray for favors and from whom I would receive punishments if I committed some moral transgressions. You could say that I was philosophically and maybe religiously precocious. Truths, verifiability (not slavish, childish, and mindless acceptance of dogmas and doctrines) and logic have always been appealing to me since an early age. 

Truths are appealing to Wittgenstein, too. He devoted his whole life to them. I have tried to read Wittgenstein, from time to time, but since I am not smart enough to digest his thoughts although I intuitively feel he is speaking for me, I have relied on the exegeses of his thoughts from people who are smarter than me. The information in the below paragraphs about Wittgenstein was taken from Wikipedia. The reasons I am bringing up Wittgenstein are two-fold. 

First, I fancy that I know something first-hand about the nature of language, first as a born stutterer and mispronouncer of certain sounds, and then incredibly enough my recognition that I have a relative ease to learn foreign languages, despite my linguistic handicaps. Articulation of sounds was a problem, and still is, to me, but understanding the structure of language and a notion that the more words available and accessible to a person, that person is more likely to think more precisely, have come naturally to me. 

Second, just as I have failed to understand Wittgenstein's thoughts without help, many others, especially my ex-girlfriends (that was maybe why they are part of the history of the lonely past), have failed to understand me because they are perhaps not smart and sensitive enough, but I have refused to explain myself to them, except saying that to really understand anything or anybody requires intelligence, sensitivity, a good framework of reference, and copious facts, not just self-projection. Self-projection, without the necessary counterpart of empathy, is a pathetic exercise in reasoning. Lack of self-awareness is often the main culprit of misunderstanding. So is rampant and pervasive stupidly. 

Wittgenstein burst into worldwide fame with the publication of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, although he was known for many years before that within the narrow philosophical circle in Europe that he was a man of genius and uncommon personality. According to Wikipedia, "At the urging of Ramsey and others, Wittgenstein returned to Cambridge in 1929. Keynes wrote in a letter to his wife: 'Well, God has arrived. I met him on the 5.15 train.' Despite this fame, he could not initially work at Cambridge as he did not have a degree, so he applied as an advanced undergraduate. Russell noted that his previous residency was sufficient for a PhD, and urged him to offer the Tractatus as his thesis. It was examined in 1929 by Russell and Moore; at the end of the thesis defence, Wittgenstein clapped the two examiners on the shoulder and said, 'Don't worry, I know you'll never understand it.' Moore wrote in the examiner's report: 'I myself consider that this is a work of genius; but, even if I am completely mistaken and it is nothing of the sort, it is well above the standard required for the Ph.D. degree.' Wittgenstein was appointed as a lecturer and was made a fellow of Trinity College."

The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Latin for "Logical-Philosophical Treatise") is the only book-length philosophical work published by Wittgenstein in his lifetime. It was an ambitious project: to identify the relationship between language and reality and to define the limits of science. It is recognized as a significant philosophical work of the twentieth century. G. E. Moore originally suggested the work's Latin title as homage to Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Baruch Spinoza.

Wittgenstein wrote the notes for Tractatus while he was a soldier during World War I and completed it when a prisoner of war at Como and later Cassino in August 1918. It was first published in German in 1921 as Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Tractatus was influential chiefly amongst the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle, such as Rudolf Carnap and Friedrich Waismann. Bertrand Russell's article "The Philosophy of Logical Atomism" is presented as a working out of ideas that he had learnt from Wittgenstein.

Tractatus employs a notoriously austere (the house Wittgenstein built for his sister was austere, too, and so was his personal life. Austerity was the hallmark of the man although he descended from a very wealthy Austrian family) and succinct literary style. The work contains almost no arguments as such, but, rather, consists of declarative statements which are meant to be self-evident. The statements are hierarchically numbered, with seven basic propositions at the primary level (numbered 1–7), with each sub-level being a comment on or elaboration of the statement at the next higher level (e.g., 1, 1.1, 1.11, 1.12).
Wittgenstein's later works, notably the posthumously published Philosophical Investigations, criticised many of the ideas in Tractatus.

There are seven main propositions in the text. These are:

The world is everything that is the case.
What is the case (a fact) is the existence of states of affairs.
A logical picture of facts is a thought.
A thought is a proposition with a sense.
A proposition is a truth-function of elementary propositions. (An elementary proposition is a truth-function of itself.)
The general form of a proposition is the general form of a truth function, which is: . This is the general form of a proposition.
Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

I only vaguely understood prepositions 1 and 7 on my own. 

Philosophical Investigations (Philosophische Untersuchungen) is a highly influential posthumous work in the 20th-century by Wittgenstein. In it, Wittgenstein discusses numerous problems and puzzles in the fields of semantics, logic, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of psychology, philosophy of action, and the philosophy of mind. He puts forth the view that conceptual confusions surrounding language use are at the root of most philosophical problems, contradicting or discarding much of what he argued in his earlier work, the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.

He alleges that the problems are traceable to a set of related assumptions about the nature of language, which themselves presuppose a particular conception of the essence of language. This conception is considered and ultimately rejected for being too general; that is, as an essentialist account of the nature of language it is simply too narrow to be able to account for the variety of things we do with language. Wittgenstein begins the book with a quotation from St. Augustine, whom he cites as a proponent of the generalized and limited conception that he then summarizes:

The individual words in language name objects—sentences are combinations of such names. In this picture of language we find the roots of the following idea: Every word has a meaning. This meaning is correlated with the word. It is the object for which the word stands.

He then sets out throughout the rest of the book to demonstrate the limitations of this conception, including, he argues, many traditional philosophical puzzles and confusions that arise as a result of this limited picture. Within the Anglo-American tradition, the book is considered by many as being one of the most important philosophical works of the 20th century, and it continues to influence contemporary philosophers, especially those studying mind and language.

As stated before, Wittgenstein's thoughts are too subtle and profound to me. However, they must have value, as witnessed the impact they have on thinkers in the 20th century. The list of such thinkers is long, consisting of luminaries such as Bertrand Russell, Norm Chomsky, G.E. Moore, Frank P. Ramsey, Vienna Circle, A.J. Ayer, Rudolf Carnap, Alan Turing, Gilbert Ryle, Saul Kripke, Donald Davidson, Daniel Dennett, John Searle,  Richard Rorty, and Colin McGinn. These are the names I recognize and I am not a student of philosophy. For a complete list of thinkers under the influence of Wittgenstein's thoughts, please go to Wikipedia. Also, please note the long list of languages, including Vietnamese, in Wikipedia written about Wittgenstein. While he was alive, Wittgenstein was convinced of his superiority and he acted accordingly. This was perhaps his only lack of social grace. Nietzsche was also cocksure of his greatness in spite of lack of due respect and adulation from his peers and the public during his lifetime. 

What I have got so far from trying to read (and read about) Wittgenstein)---and I could be all wrong and off base--- is that language is indispensable in understanding the world. Even so, there are certain "truths" that can't even be conveyed by language. To have an understanding of the world we are in, we must embark on a similar intellectual journey undertaken by Wittgenstein, seriously and honestly and totally devoted to uncover "truths" obtained by the fruits of our own labor, and not the "truths" handed down by dogmas and doctrines. His two books are the recording of those "truths". "Truths" are all personal and must be authentic and lived, and not something we pay lip service to. Terry Eagleton, famed British literary theorist and critic, has described Wittgenstein as the philosopher of poets and composers, playwrights and novelists. Still, Wittgenstein was a solitary and strange bird, gay, and had brief but intense liaisons with a few men. He died in the home of his doctor as he didn't want to die in the hospital. His last moments were described as follows:

Wittgenstein began work on his final manuscript, MS 177, on 25 April 1951. It was his 62nd birthday on 26 April. He went for a walk the next afternoon, and wrote his last entry that day, 27 April. That evening, he became very ill; when his doctor told him he might live only a few days, he reportedly replied, "Good!" Joan (doctor's wife) stayed with him throughout that night, and just before losing consciousness for the last timeon 28 April, he told her: "Tell them I've had a wonderful life". Norman Malcolm (American philosopher, student and friend of Wittgenstein) describes this as a "strangely moving utterance". 

Bertrand Russell was not wrong in describing Wittgenstein as a mystic. Here was how Wittgenstein viewed death:

"Death is not an event in life: we do not live to experience death. If we take eternity to mean not infinite temporal duration but timelessness, then eternal life belongs to those who live in the present. Our life has no end in the way in which our visual field has no limits."
— Wittgenstein, Tractatus, 6.431

Didn't I mention that Wittgenstein confessed that he had a loss of faith in God when he was in high school? Similarly, Bertrand Russell lost his when he was 15. Albert Camus didn't believe in God either. I have a strange, bold, and stupid idea that humans are divided into theists and atheists, meat-eaters and vegetarians, and atheists and vegetarians are more evolved humans, but there are always exceptions. Hitler was a vegetarian. Maybe Hitler was highly evolved (he had incredible charisma and artistic sensibilities), but he let hate destroy him. That should be a lesson for me. I am working on getting rid of my hate, on ignoring and forgetting the vicious, nasty, malicious, and wrong comments and accusations leveled at me by ignoramuses with puny, tiny minds, who are not equipped to understand me. 

Wittgenstein died with four of his former students being at his bedside. They were at first unsure what Wittgenstein would have wanted, but then remembered he had said he hoped his Catholic friends would pray for him, so they did, and he was pronounced dead shortly afterwards. When it is my time to die, I just want those who really love me to be there. I don't wish any clergyman to be there. I have lived my life as an atheist. I want to die as one. I seriously doubt if any of my ex-wives or ex-girlfriends will be at my funeral. I don't want them to be there anyway. I have had enough comedies and farces during my lifetime. 

Wittgenstein was reportedly said that he actually asserted that he had a wonderful life. But I am not sure by "wonderful", he meant "happy" because in reading about him, he was also reportedly to be unhappy and contemplative of suicide. Only when doing philosophy, he was at peace. My own life has been eventful and exciting and turbulent, but I wouldn't call it "wonderful". Yes, the woman by the nick name VAW was correct: I have had over two dozen women who professed  to having loved me. I told her about them, not to brag, but to really communicate about my search for true love. I told her about them because I loved her and thought she loved me. I was wrong about her then. I am right about her now. Hindsight is always 20/20. I didn't tell her about my obsession with suicide, otherwise she would also be mocking me about that. She does have a constricted heart and a small mind. I belatedly found that out. I of course despise her completely, having found who she really is. I am very glad she is completely out of my life and mind. Of the 24 women whom I have known in the Biblical sense and who professed a love for me, only two really did and they are dead. I have written about them under the guise of fiction. There are currently two who exhibit an interest---perhaps only platonically---in me, but alarms inside my head keep going off. I am not perturbed, however. I like the sound the alarm is making. I am finally getting some wisdom. I am also feeling lonely no more. I have made peace with who I am. I will go on vacation with them in Tahiti and Seattle in a few months in a yacht. 

Wissai
October 31, 2013


Meditated Message to a self-deceiving, nasty, sarcastic JAW

You talked a good game, but by failing to see that you are a nobody who has no talents and have accomplished nothing worthwhile, you are still very much into denial. By any standard, you are just an ungifted plain Jane. Your nastiness and inferiority complex lurk deep in your soul. I am much more honest about myself than you are about yourself. I am vastly superior to you. You know that and I know that. By hiding behind the phony, false injunction, "thou shall not judge!", you seek comfort in an illusion that nobody has a right to judge you. You fail to see a human uses his mind to evaluate his surroundings, including any human animal being in front of him. Is the animal a friend or a foe? Is the animal benign or dangerous? We judge, pass judgment, assess, evaluate, compare and contrast ourselves and others 24/7. That's why I often say you cannot think logically. You are not smart enough. You employ trite, worn statements as guiding posts. You are not kind or enlightened as you profess to be. Your incursions into Buddhism are a joke! If you are really a Buddhist, you would see I have spoken with heart and fearlessness. Truth is my guiding light, not self-deception. 

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Life-affirming Approach

Life-affirming approach means we go with the flow while holding onto a notion that while life in its essence is value-free and not necessarily meaningful or meaningless, it is up to us to create a purpose and meaning in our own life, in our existence. We affirm and believe in the continuation of our existence because as long as we are still alive, there's a possibility, a likelihood we can bring about a positive change, an improvement in our existence. To turn our backs on life is to embark on a descent to a hell of our creation.

Only smart and artistic humans (like you) can really understand me. Stupid and unaccomplished folks like the two fat midgets would never understand and thus appreciate me. What they commented about me said more about them than me. They are too stupid to possess empathy, too coarse to be artistic, too stubborn and weak-willed to change for the better. In a way, I was glad of having dated them and found out, albeit quite belatedly, that I am made of much finer stuff than they are. To have consciousness is to be aware, to notice the differences and similarities between self and others. It is a process all sentient beings do automatically. Only fools parrot and swallow whole the injunction, "thou shall not judge!". We compare, we judge, then we reassess based on new data, if available. That's how we slouch to realities, to truths. 

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Emotional Cowardice

Emotional Cowardice

I think what happened was that the two fat midgets couldn't accept many realities of who they are. They not only lack intellectual courage, but also emotional fortitude. They just refused to accept they were unaccomplished nobodies. How pathetic of them! It would be hard for me to live a life as they do, but I suppose they love life so much that they have to live with a lie about themselves. Assholes and scumbags are like these two ugly, fat midgets. They convince themselves that they are better than they actually are. By doing so, they have some semblance of balance in their lives so they can survive. 

Tempest in a Teapot

The Story of Redemption and the Violent Storm in the Teapot It Caused

Truths come in many forms and disguises. And we must be ready for them, otherwise we would miss them completely, especially if we are not too smart and yet think we are intelligent, wise, and clever. Just because we parrot some words of Buddha (and yet giving no due acknowledgement) that does not necessarily mean we fully understand them. We must really live those words. Our hearts and our minds must be ready for them. 

A person's level of understanding reflects in how he reacts to truths and words of wisdom. There was a third reaction to my story about redemption. It came from a lady (most of my friends are of the fair sex). She is a new friend, but she has read my blog and she understands what she has read. She has a mind and a heart for my words. She is no fool, like the other two who have fragile egos born out of weak intellects, small minds, constricted hearts, and inferiority complexes due to being nobodies all their long, lonely, unhappy lives. But enough about fools who think they are somebodies, about cowards who think they are brave, about ignoramuses who think they are full of wisdom. My patience and my kindness with them have limits. Those limits have been exhausted. I cannot save them anymore. They must save themselves. 

I wrote "A Story of Redemption" because the young Korean-American man's life was very interesting and almost a tragedy, just like mine almost was a tragedy more than 40 years ago. He was saved by a very good "Global Performance Coach". I was saved by my love for my mother. I couldn't bring myself to hurting her emotionally. One must live for something or somebody bigger than oneself, otherwise one's life would be common, ordinary, and animal-like. Love makes one become bigger and stronger. When I read about the young man's life, I was very affected. I recognized his awesome gifts and talents. I could see his intelligence in his strikingly handsome, gorgeous face. I am no slouch myself in the departments of intelligence and looks, but unlike some fools, I readily acknowledge superiority in others. I am perfectly comfortable with myself. I have some gifts and many, many foibles. I am who I am. I try to be the best who I can be within the confines of my limitations. With regard to poker, I am a small potato. I have been a small winner, year after year. That's all I can be. Many of my friends have moved on and become millionaires. stacking their money in safe deposit boxes (to avoid paying taxes and for convenience---they have access to their funds 24/7) in poker rooms all over country). I am happy for them. I am not jealous of them. Not at all. I am not jealous of Steve (name of the young man) either. He is a rarity. He is a superstar. I salute his poker superiority over me. 

In about a week, the finals of the 2013 Main Event ($10,000 entry fee) No Limit Hold'Em (a game invented by Texans in early 1950's or so) of The World Series of Poker will be played in Vegas. There are 9 players left from over 6,000 contestants. The winner will be paid $6 million and some change. Ninth-placed finisher will be paid almost $800,000. There's a Vietnamese player, J.C. Tran, in the finals. He's experienced and well-known. He's a favorite to win. In the past, Scotty Nguyen won the championship. 

You can follow the finals on the Net or live in order to savor the atmosphere. No Lmit Poker is a financial full-contact sport. It's the best game ever invented by Man. It resembles real life the most. It's far better than chess. If you think you are very smart, knowledgeable about the human mind, and brave, I urge you to take up the sport. You will find out really fast who you really are and what you are made of. The public don't realize that lawyers, engineers, businessmen, and college graduates all over the world have been flocking to the game ever since a young accountant with an improbable name Chris Moneymaker (real name, a very nice man, I have met him) won the championship in 2003. 

Wissai
October 29, 2013

Monday, October 28, 2013

A story of Redemption



A story of Redemption.

Foreword:

I've cleaned up the grammatical errors due to my propensity for haste. My soul was laid bare in this fictionalized real life story. It was another manifesto of a vain, but honest man. What I have found most distasteful about so many human animals I have met is that they tend to inflate their pathetic, meager "achievements" which in the scheme of things didn't amount to anything worthy to be impressed with, that is to say, they have not made a name for themselves in the world (nobody knows about them except their family members and a few friends and acquaintances) and they have not produced anything contributory to human knowledge and aesthetics. They didn't and don't impress me, not even an iota. I am only impressed by real thinkers who wrote influential books and artists who left lasting legacy. 

A real man must know who he is and his true worth. (Also, a really talented man does something that very few persons can do. If you have done something that thousands and millions of other humans can do, you have no bragging rights. Ask yourself if you are a Bobby Fischer, a Wittgenstein, a Shakespeare, an Einstein, etc...or if you are an insignificant, untalented regurgitator of undigested facts and don't have a single original idea or thought in your head, and your religious and political ideas are what you got from your parents and from what you heard from Fox "News" or CNN. Can you hold your own in a debate? Can you really think? ). An asshole, on the other hand, is a stinking blowhard, full of ugly sound and fury, signifying a sordid stench. 

----------------------------------------------------------------
I believe in redemption. Big time. I also believe in forgiveness, especially self-forgiveness. And grace. My life has been a struggle against hate and vengeance and self-destruction, as well as contempt for human animals. I wasn't too smart. I thought slowly on my feet. I was naive and gullible and stupidly not cognizant that life in its essence was not so much about love as about power dynamics. To be weak is to invite attack. To be kind-hearted is to be exploited, again and again. The key is to be firm with human animals and to stay away from them, if possible. 

I'm a bit wiser now. I'm no longer a starry-eyed, clumsy, hot-headed little ignoramus. Life has taught me to become wary of human animals. I'm glad that I haven't been in jail or killed because of my follies. You could say I was lucky. 

The following story is real and reported in a poker magazine. It was not about me, but eerily resonant with me. There were some parallels.

A young Korean-American who was strikingly handsome and came from an educated family, dropped out of college with just a few more credits to go in order to pursue a career in poker. By the time he was 23 years old, he had made millions (4) and a name for himself in the poker tournament circuits, an achievement that millions of poker players want to have, but only about 5 persons in the world could do that at that young an age, considering one has to be 21 of age to enter a tournament. In December 2009, when he came in fourth and won "only" $400,000, he was so despondent that he blew most of that prize money at a blackjack table. A few weeks later, on New Year's Eve, he decided, for the first time in his life, to try drugs. Unsurprisingly, drugs proved to be stronger than his brain's chemistry. He was hooked and became addictive and unhealthily paranoid. Amazingly, he continued to be successful in poker while his life was in a descent to hell. He continued his forays into blackjack. An episode best illustrated this period in his life. One night, he was down $250,000 playing blackjack when he blacked out. When he regained consciousness in the morning, he was up $1.2 million. He has very minimal recollection of how that happened. 

At any rate, he thought very little of his life. He sought help from doctors and psychiatrists to no avail, until his mother heard of a "Global Performance Coach" in Hawaii from a friend at church. It took the coach only 10 days to get the young man free of all addictive substances that he was using. The coach explained his methodology as follows:

"We came into this world with a blank slate, innocent and impressionable. Then things, good and bad, happened to us. Very bad things threatened our survival and caused traumas to us, if we survived. We had psychic scars, caused by heightened fear responses. Then as we move forward through life, anything that resembles the traumas will reopen the wounds, and the old tapes of bad experiences and our responses to them will replay themselves. That's how weak-willed humans get stuck in bad habits and addictions. We are the sum total of our experiences, but we do have higher consciousness and we can apply this higher consciousness in identifying the trigger points and avoiding being Pavlovian dogs. Freud was right. We do have Death Instinct, in addition to the Will to Live. In many ways, there is much dualism in this world. It doesn't hurt to think in terms of dualism. We just have to remember that we have to transcend dualism and achieve integration. A healthy human is the one who has learned to master the warring forces inside him. I just told this immensely talented young poker player that he had nothing to fear in this world because death is already a given. We fear because we're afraid to lose what we have or what we hope to have but are not sure if we can have it. Just be sensible, do the right things, put the maximum effort into whatever we do and the results will take care of themselves. "

I applied this insight from the coach and came to understand why certain scumbags and assholes behave the way they do. They are just nasty fearful animals full of disguised inferiority complexes, over-proud of their meager "achievements" which are not earth-shaking at all, and unwilling to admit their foibles. So they have to lie, cheat, make up stories to make themselves look good, even if they know their peers know about their true nature which is full of cheap animalism. A human, if his human attributes not properly developed, will end up worse than a wild beast. You can tell a human animal by its brazen bullshit, its furtive glances, its unsubstantiated bragging, and its failure to admit and welcome facts, truths, and logic into its "life".  It craves for respect, but all it does is to denigrate itself constantly and unwittingly. It wants to win an argument at any cost. It always thinks it's in the right.

By the way, the young Korean-American, now 27 years old, won another $2 million in poker tournaments since his cure from addictions. He recently said that he used to want just to be alive because he was in such a dark place, and now that he has stepped into the light, everything that is feasible is possible if maximum effort is expended. He has found redemption. Life is now beautiful and no longer a burden.

Wissai
October 27, 2013.

Reactions to my post:

About 4 hours have elapsed, and so far, two "humans" (women) in the bcc recipients wrote back. What they wrote didn't surprise me a bit. They apparently either weren't equipped to understand me or their English was so pathetically elementary that they failed to get past the transparency in order to fathom the connotative meanings of my words. What monkeys (the two women) saw when they looked into the mirror (my words) was the image of themselves! They couldn't see the angel (me) grinning in the background. Their cognitive abilities were abjectly dismal! Needless to say, these two women were the least accomplished of all the recipients. Perhaps that was why my words stung them and they felt compelled to speak up in a typically stupid manner.

When Henry Miller got his "Tropic of Cancer" published in Paris, prudish and stupid readers decried the alleged pornographic elements contained therein, while the more discerning men of letters (Lawrence Durrell, Erza Pound, Karl Shapiro, Norman Mailer, and so on) recognized a free spirit and a revolutionary approach to fiction writing. Nowadays, Henry Miller is part and parcel of American literary history. The above can understand the below, but the below can never understand the above. Where you stand can affect what you see. Ditto for your intellect. A stupid and ignorant person can never understand a more intelligent, sensitive, and knowledgeable person. 

Thus spoke Wissai


The Viet woman was so common and pedestrian that she triggered a yawning chasm of disbelief and contempt inside me when I read her words. I definitely will not cc or bcc her anything I write from now on. After I broke off with her in August 2011(because of her selfishness, cheapness, and failure to keep her promises), she tried to get back to me twice after leaving nasty and obscene messages on my phone and emails, but I was cool to her overtures. She was still trying to keep me interested by cc to me her mails, but today, she just killed off any lingering sentiments I once had for her. 

I was far more successful, financially and romantically, than I let on (in five weeks, I will spend ten days in Tahiti. I will have a chance to freshen my French. In June, I will spend a vacation in Seattle with a friend where I will cruise around in a yacht having two bedrooms, and spend time in a cabin on an island and in another cabin on the mountain. I am not lonely as I let on in my writings). I didn't want to reveal to her too much of my finance and my personal life. In retrospect, I am glad I was being prudent. Her words described more her conditions than mine. But, as I said, humans have a tendency to read themselves into other people's words or lives. I knew her well. She used to be a college classmate of mine in Vietnam. She was a totally common woman. I didn't regret of having a romantic relationship with her. I learned a lesson about humanity. 

Wissai

A sensitive reading "A Story of Redemption"

Dear all:

Please note:

The author used some of my original words and then added her own comments in color. But I didn't know how to preserve the coloring when I copied them in my post. The reader just has to go through the deciphering process. That would be more fun and challenging that way.


[…] I am only impressed by real thinkers who wrote influential books and artists who left lasting legacy. I have to respect your choice. but you will miss lots of good quality fellow-companionship on the way.. It is ok though. I will be around.
{…} don't have a single original idea or thought in your head, and your religious and political ideas are what you got from your parents and from what you heard from Fox "News" or CNN. It is funny when you mentioned Fox News . I knew people who are so addicted to it.. {…} > Wissai
> A story of Redemption.
>{…} …I also believe in forgiveness, especially self-forgiveness.YES big time… And grace. Yes you may call it grace, I haven’t found a word for it…I want to see it as this : My 100% awareness at all the time would catch the right moment to click and there I am saved again…I am saying this from life experiences. {…}.. that life in its essence was not so much about love as about power dynamics. To be weak is to invite attack. To be kind-hearted is to be exploited, again and again. The key is to be firm with human animals and to stay away from them, if possible. Yes yes yes…You can say it again and again…1- there is power dynamics in love too. 2- a weak person is a loser, a kind hearted can easily be a weakee, but to be firm is to be strong and fearless. 3- It takes 1- and 2- above to stay away from those you call human animals or for them to stay away from you instead. Just to think about it makes me feel fearless.
{…} I'm glad that I haven't been in jail or killed because of my follies. You could say I was lucky. 
I say you have been very lucky…Or is it grace (your word) or in my word (I haven’t got a word for it but it is like ýou fall and you get up with your arms and knees… then after a thousand and one time of falling… you realize that you have been making it before you fall.. Know what I mean?)
> The following story is real and reported in a poker magazine. It was not about me, but eerily resonant with me. There were some parallels.
> A young Korean-American who was strikingly handsome Is being handsome a must here? Or you just add it on to make it more yummy? and came from an educated family, dropped out of college with just a few more credits to go in order to pursue a career in poker. By the time he was 23 years old, he had made millions (4) and a name for himself in the poker tournament circuits…{…}, for the first time in his life, to try drugs. Unsurprisingly, drugs proved to be stronger than his brain's chemistry. He was hooked and became addictive and unhealthily paranoid.{…} a "Global Performance Coach" took [..] only 10 days to get the young man free of all addictive substances that he was using. The coach explained ; {…}
{…} as we move forward through life, anything that resembles the traumas will reopen the wounds, and the old tapes of bad experiences and our responses to them will replay themselves. My awareness has been very good to me on this. Later I had dreams, very interesting  recurrent dreams. Not until I acknowledge the meaning of it, that the dreams went away. That's how weak-willed humans get stuck in bad habits and addictions. We are the sum total of our experiences, but we do have higher consciousness and we can apply this higher consciousness in identifying the trigger points and avoiding being Pavlovian dogs.I strongly agreed. Freud was right. We do have Death Instinct, in addition to the Will to Live. In many ways, there is much dualism in this world. It doesn't hurt to think in terms of dualism.Yes Things balance one another, and we are holding the scale, while our awareness makes the scale firm and working. We just have to remember that we have to transcend dualism and achieve integration. Here comes the importance of living in the present. Letting go is a must. A healthy human is the one who has learned to master the warring forces inside him. I just told this immensely talented young poker player that he had nothing to fear in this world because death is already a given. YES, We finally come to the big Word: Fearlessness. We fear because we're afraid to lose what we have or what we hope to have but are not sure if we can have it. Right again. Easy to say, but it might take the whole life to get it. Culture and social/familial conditions have a lot to say in this. Just be sensible, do the right things, put the maximum effort into whatever we do and the results will take care of themselves. Perfect conclusion..Hahaha…You use the word sensible, and I use awareness. They are the same I suppose except my word means more being the un-judgmental witness with no emotional consideration than sensitivity alone.
{…}
> I applied this insight from the coach and came to understand why certain scumbags and assholes behave the way they do. {…} You are right about this but I doubt that you can get them to change by telling them how bad they are: The week hang on tight for life when feeling being attacked. The fearful is at their hiding places with closed doors, the ignorant already have his’/her senses plugged., the violent react with violence, for life or death. Only those who have survived so much ups and downs in their lives would listen, and your story would have the same effect as their recurrent dreams (one day I will tell you my life story, along with my own experiences) Your words and your life will be a living example to them. Seeing you alive would be like seeing a float ... in a disaster at sea; they need to see a float to feel safe first then you can tell them to move around. Only when they see a good result from their own making… they would be willing to change…The above works for those who already have the seed of a free spirit, intelligence, action and self respect in them. ( I was one of them)
Between you and me, even that and more…I can’t guarantee you that all your human-animals would NOT be happily ever “happy humans”. You know how many have tried to change them.. You are not the first. Neither the last. Better leave them alone.
The best you can do is being ready to have them getting away from you. The equivalent to : you avoid them, and they fear you so they avoid you too. Hahaha…
The rest ? These would like to follow, and there come religions…They need leaders to promise and tell them what to do…and that is another story. Another sad one.

> By the way, the young Korean-American, now 27 years old, won another $2 million in poker tournaments since his cure from addictions. He recently said that he used to want just to be alive because he was in such a dark place, and now that he has stepped into the light, everything that is feasible is possible if maximum effort is expended. He has found redemption. Life is now beautiful and no longer a burden.I am happy for him, though each of us will have a different ending. I should not mess up with his.
> Wissai : to the author, I take off my hat to say thanks and share my admiration for a work well done.
This should call for a celebration. I bring him Peace of mind and love. JH. 

> October 28, 2013.

A story of Redemption.

I believe in redemption. Big time. I also believe in forgiveness, especially self-forgiveness. And grace. My life has been a struggle against hate and vengeance and self-destruction, as well as contempt for human animals. I wasn't too smart. I thought slowly on my feet. I was naive and gullible and stupidly not cognizant that life in its essence was not so much about love as about power dynamics. To be weak is to invite attack. To be kind-hearted is to be exploited, again and again. The key is to be firm with human animals and to stay away from them, if possible. 

I'm a bit wiser now. I'm no longer a starry-eyed, clumsy, hot-headed little ignoramus. Life has taught me to become wary of human animals. I'm glad that I haven't been in jail or killed because of my follies. You could say I was lucky. 

The following story is real and reported in a poker magazine. It was not about me, but eerily resonant with me. There were some parallels.

A young Korean-American who was strikingly handsome and came from an educated family, dropped out of college with just a few more credits to go in order to pursue a career in poker. By the time he was 23 years old, he had made millions (4) and a name for himself in the poker tournament circuits, an achievement that millions of poker players want to have, but only about 5 persons in the world could do that at that young an age, considering one has to be 21 of age to enter a tournament. In December 2009, when he came in fourth and won "only" $400,000, he was so despondent that he blew most of that prize money at a blackjack table. A few weeks later, on New Year's Eve, he decided, for the first time in his life, to try drugs. Unsurprisingly, drugs proved to be stronger than his brain's chemistry. He was hooked and became addictive and unhealthily paranoid. Amazingly, he continued to be successful in poker while his life was in a descent to hell. He continued his forays into blackjack. An episode best illustrated this period in his life. One night, he was down $250,000 playing blackjack when he blacked out. When he regained consciousness in the morning, he was up $1.2 million. He has very minimal recollection of how that happened. 

At any rate, he thought very little of his life. He sought help from doctors and psychiatrists to no avail, until his mother heard of a "Global Performance Coach" in Hawaii from a friend at church. It took the coach only 10 days to get the young man free of all addictive substances that he was using. The coach explained his methodology as follows:

"We came into this world with a blank slate, innocent and impressionable. Then things, good and bad, happened to us. Very bad things threatened our survival and caused traumas to us, if we survived. We had psychic scars, caused by heightened fear responses. Then as we move forward through life, anything that resembles the traumas will reopen the wounds, and the old tapes of bad experiences and our responses to them will replay themselves. That's how weak-willed humans get stuck in bad habits and addictions. We are the sum total of our experiences, but we do have higher consciousness and we can apply this higher consciousness in identifying the trigger points and avoiding being Pavlovian dogs. Freud was right. We do have Death Instinct, in addition to the Will to Live. In many ways, there is much dualism in this world. It doesn't hurt to think in terms of dualism. We just have to remember that we have to transcend dualism and achieve integration. A healthy human is the one who has learned to master the warring forces inside him. I just told this immensely talented young poker player that he had nothing to fear in this world because death is already a given. We fear because we're afraid to lose what we have or what we hope to have but are not sure if we can have it. Just be sensible, do the right things, put the maximum effort into whatever we do and the results will take care of themselves. "

I applied this insight from the coach and came to understand why certain scumbags and assholes behave the way they do. They are just nasty fearful animals full of disguised inferiority complexes, over-proud of their meager "achievements" which are not earth-shaking at all, and unwilling to admit their foibles. So they have to lie, cheat, make up stories to make themselves look good, even if they know their peers know about their true nature which is full of cheap animalism. A human, if his human attributes not properly developed, will end up worse than a wild beast. You can tell a human animal by its brazen bullshit, its furtive glances, its unsubstantiated bragging, and its failure to admit and welcome facts, truths, and logic into its "life".  It craves for respect, but all it does is to denigrate itself constantly and unwittingly. It wants to win an argument at any cost. It always thinks it's in the right.

By the way, the young Korean-American, now 27 years old, won another $2 million in poker tournaments since his cure from addictions. He recently said that he used to want just to be alive because he was in such a dark place, and now that he has stepped into the light, everything that is feasible is possible if maximum effort is expended. He has found redemption. Life is now beautiful and no longer a burden.

Wissai
October 27, 2013.

Sunday, October 27, 2013

I've been thinking

I've Been Thinking

I've been thinking if I am being blessed or heading for a fall of some kind. Time will tell. I'm not greedy. Not really. Far from it. At any rate, I won't get conceited and elated or depressed and down on myself one way or another. I am not ignorant or stupid anymore. I have learned to face the muted and disinherited noises from my wounded heart; I have confronted the denied aspects of my soul, the places where I previously turned my back against. 

I know the ultimate purpose of my life which is to develop my mind, to write creatively, to live an honorable life, and to shoot for the attainable but so far elusive dream. 

At long last, I think I have arrived at some deep understanding of who I am. I need to cultivate the loving side of me and keep my heart as a blooming, nectar-rich flower where birds of paradise love to visit. I don't have to be a victim of my past. I can start living afresh and anew with every single day as the sun rises every morning from the eastern horizon. To be alive and in good health and with money should be a nice feeling if I have the purpose of my life clearly understood. 

Oh boy, I hear the music again tonight
From far, far away.
I don't quite understand what it wants to convey
But I'm not putting up a fight.
I wonder if thou art the one that sent the music my way
And set this heart of mine on fire.
All I can do is to take my iPad out and write
Until the fire subsides.

Thursday, October 24, 2013

I woke up this morning with a dream

I woke up this morning with a dream
 
                                                       2lm

I woke up this morning with a dream
That at long last thou art a woman of mine
Dost thou realize things are more than what they seem?
I dreamed that our feelings for each other are almost divine
We both are in the twilight of our lives
Days are getting shorter and lonelier are the nights
Come to me and hold me really tight
Make me feel loved and wanted before I close my eyes

Wissai
October 24, 2013

Facts, Myths, Truths, and Religion

Facts, Myths, Truths, and Religion

You can find out about certain truths all by yourself, if you are really smart. Or you can rely on others to do the legwork for you. That means you take the trouble to read what others, presumably smarter than you, who have spent years and decades to research and think about certain truths. 

Everything that rises will converge. That's your own insight. Politics, religion, philosophy, and worldview (Weltanschauung) of a person are all interconnected. And every living human possesses an outlook on life, whether he is aware of that or not, even when he adamantly denies that he is political, religious, philosophical and so on. To be human is to have a certain attitude. We are what we think we are. The following are notes, taken verbatim, from a book written by Reza Aslan on Islam ("No god but God").  Aslan's English is far better than yours. He also has spent a lot of his time to study religion in a formal manner while you only took up the subject of religion in a haphazard manner. Superiority is a matter of relativity and degree and subject-specific. The book is magnificent. Any self-regarding "educated" person should read it so he/she is no longer a victim of ignorance and an easy prey of propaganda from certain quarters in the West. Truth will make us free. By the way, you are not a Muslim. You are an infidel. More precisely, you are a dyed-in the-wool atheist who has a keen interest in religion which in your view, as stated above, is only an integral part of a person's outlook . 

Myth, which originally signified nothing more than stories of the supernatural, has come to be regarded as synonymous with falsehood, when in fact myths are always true. By their very nature, myths inhere here both legitimacy and credibility. Whatever truths they convey have little to do with historical fact. To ask whether Moses actually parted the Red Sea, or whether Jesus truly raised Lazarus from the dead, or whether the word of God indeed poured through the lips of Muhammad, is to ask totally irrelevant questions. The only question that matters with regard to a religion and its mythology is "What do these stories mean?"

Evangelists interpret historical events in order to give structure and meaning to the myths and rituals of their community, provide future generations with a common identity, a common aspiration, a common story. Religion, by definition, is interpretation; and by definition, all interpretations are valid. However, some interpretations are more reasonable than others. And as the Jewish philosopher and mystic Moses Maimonides noted, it is reason, not imagination, which determines what is probable and what is not. 

Muhammad's revolutionary message of moral accountability and social egalitarianism was gradually reinterpreted by his successors into competing ideologies of rigid legalism and uncompromising orthodoxy, which fractured the Muslim community and widened the gap between mainstream, or Sunni, Islam and its two major sectarian movements, Shiism and Sufism. Although sharing a common sacred history, each group strove to develop its own interpretation of scripture, its own ideas on theology and the law, and its own community of faith. And each had different responses to the experience of colonialism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Indeed, that experience forced the entire Muslim community to reconsider the role of faith in modern society. While some Muslims pushed for the creation of an indigenous Islamic Enlightenment by eagerly developing Islamic alternatives to Western secular notions of democracy, others advocated separation from Western cultural ideals in favor of complete "Islamization" of society. With the end of colonialism and the birth of the Islamic state in the twentieth century, these two groups have refined their arguments against the backdrop of the ongoing debate in the Muslim world over the prospect of forming a genuine Islamic democracy. At the center of the debate over Islam and democracy is a far more significant internal struggle over who gets to define the Islamic Reformation that is already under way in most of the Muslim world. 

The reformation of Christianity was a terrifying process, but it was not, as it has so often been presented, a collision between Protestant Reform and Catholic intransigence. Rather, the Christian Reformation was an argument over the future of the faith---a violent, bloody argument that engulfed Europe in devastation and war for more than a century.

Thus far, the Islamic Reformation has proved no different. For most of the Western world, September 11, 2001, signaled the commencement of a worldwide struggle between Islam and the West---the ultimate manifestation of the clash of civilizations. From the Islamic perspective, however, the attacks on New York and Washington were part of an ongoing clash between those Muslims who strive to reconcile their religious values with the realities of the modern world, and those who react to modernism and reform by reverting---sometimes fanatically---to the "fundamentals" of their faith. 

The book ("No god but God") is an argument for reform. There are those will call it apostasy, but that is not troubling. No one speaks for God---not even the prophets (who speak about God). There are those who will call it apology, but that is hardly a bad thing. An apology is a defense, and there is no higher calling than to defend one's faith, especially from ignorance and hate, and thus to help shape the story of that faith. 

M never claimed to have invented a new religion. By his own admission, M's message was an attempt to reform the existing religious beliefs and cultural practices of pre-Islamic Arabia as to bring the God of the News and Christians to the Arab peoples (Koran 42:13). 

M dealt with the demise of the tribal ethic in Mecca. He called for an end to false contracts and the practice of usury that had made slaves of the poor. He spoke of the rights of the rights of the underprivileged and the oppressed, and made the astonishing claim that it was the duty of the rich and powerful to take care of them. 

In 613, three years after the Revelation had begun, M's message underwent a dramatic transformation, one that is best summed up in the twofold profession of faith that would henceforth define both the mission and principles of the movement:
"There is no god but God, and M is God's messenger." From this point forward in M's ministry, the monotheism that had been implicit in the earliest recitations became the dominant theology behind what had thus far been primarily a social message. 

At the time of Islamic expansion after the death of M, religion and the state were one unified entity. Your religion was your ethnicity, your culture, and your social identity; it defined your politics, your economics, and your ethics. More than anything else, your religion was your citizenship. Thus, the Holy Roman Empire had its officially sanctioned and legally enforced version of Christianity, just as the Sassanian Empire had its officially sanctioned and legally enforced version of Zoroastrianism. In the Indian subcontinent, Vaisnava Kingdoms (devotees of Vishnu and his incarnations) vied with Saiva kingdoms (devotees of Shiva) for territorial control, while in China, Buddhist rulers fought Taoist rulers for political ascendancy. Throughout every one of these regions, but especially in the Near East, where religion explicitly sanctioned the state, territorial expansion was identical to religious proselytization. Thus, every religion was a "religion of the sword."

The term "holy war" originates not with Islam but with the Christian Crusaders who first used it to give theological legitimacy to what was a battle for land and trade routes. "HW" was not a term used by Muslim conquerors, and it is in no way a proper definition of the word jihad. The word j literally means "a struggle", "a striving", or "a great effort". In its primary religious connotation (sometimes referred to as "the greater jihad"), it means the struggle of the soul to overcome the sinful obstacles that keep a person from God. This is why the word j is nearly always followed in the Quran by the phrase "in the way if a God." However, because Islam considers this inward struggle for holiness and submission to be inseparable from the outward struggle for the welfare of humanity, j has more often been associated with its secondary connotation ("the lesser jihad"): that is, any exertion---military or otherwise---against oppression and tyranny. And while this definition has occasionally been manipulated by militants and extremists to give religious sanction to what are social and political agendas. War, according to the Quran, is either just or unjust, it is never "holy."

Muslim Law, which considers Jews and Christians "protected peoples", neither required not encouraged their conversion to Islam. Pagans and polytheists, however, were given a choice between conversion and death. Islamic law did prohibit Jews and Christians from openly proselytizing their faith in public places. Such prohibitions affected Christians more than they did Jews, who have been historically disinclined toward both proselytizing and public displays of their religious rituals. 

Theological differences Islam has with C and J:

Trinity: Muhammad considered it intolerably heretical innovation created by ignorance and error. "God is one. God is eternal. He has neither begotten anyone, nor is he begotten of anyone" (Korean 112: 1-3)

Religions become institutions when the myths and rituals that once shaped their sacred histories are transformed into authoritative models of orthodoxy (the correct interpretations of myths) and orthopraxy (the correct interpretations of rituals), though one is often emphasized over the other. Christianity may be the supreme example of an "orthodoxic" religion; it is principally one's beliefs---expressed through creed---that make one a Christian. On the opposite end of the spectrum is Judaism, a quintessentially "orthopraxic" religion, where it is principally one's actions---expressed through the Law---that makes one an observant Jew. It is not that beliefs are irrelevant in Judaism, or actions unimportant in Christianity. Rather, it is that of the two religions, Judaism places far greater emphasis on orthopraxic behavior than does Christianity.

Like Judaism, Islam is primarily an orthopraxic religion. However, because the Ulama have tended to regard Islamic practice as informing Islamic theology,  orthopraxy and orthodoxy are intimately bound together in Islam, meaning questions of theology, or kalam, are impossible to separate from questions of law, fiqh. Their ultimate objective was to form strict guidelines that would establish exactly who was and who was not a Muslim. The result of their labors became what is now commonly known as the Five Pillars of Islam, which are meant as a metaphor for Islam. They are a summary of not just what is required to be a member of the Ummah, but also of what it means to be a Muslim. 

Contrary to perception, the Pillars are not oppressive obligations. These are highly pragmatic rituals, in that the believer is responsible only for those tasks that he or she is able to perform. Nor are the Pillars mere perfunctory actions. The single most important factor in the performance of any Muslim ritual is the believer's intention, which must be consciously proclaimed before the ritual can begin. 

The Shariah, called the "core and kernel of Islam" by Joseph Schacht, was developed by the Ulma as the basis for the judgment of all actions in Islam as good or bad, to be rewarded or punished. More specifically, the S recognized five categories of behavior:

1) actions that are obligatory, in that their performance is rewarded and their omission punished; 
2) actions that are meritorious, in that their performance may be rewarded, but their neglect is not punished;
3) actions that are neutral and indifferent;
4) actions that are reprehensible, though not necessarily punished; 
5) actions that are forbidden and punished.

These five categories are designed to demonstrate Islam's over-arching concern with not only forbidding voice, but also actively promoting virtue. 

Sufism: For Sufis, Islam is neither law nor theology, neither creed nor ritual; rather, Islam is merely the means through which the believer can destroy his ego so as to become one with the creator of the heavens and the earth. 

While the annihilation of the ego may be a common goal to all mystical movements, there are a few important differences between S and traditional ideals of mysticism. 

First,there exists in Islam a stringent anti-monasticism. Put simply, Islam is a communal religion. 
Second, the Quran categorically derides celibacy as against the command of God to "be fruitful and multiply."
Third, Islam, like all religions, can claim to point humanity to god, whereas S's goal is to thrust humanity to God.

Islam and religious pluralism:

It is pluralism, not secularism, that defines democracy. A democratic state can be established upon any normative moral framework a long as pluralism remains the source of its legitimacy. The State of Israel is founded upon an exclusivity Jewish moral framework that recognizes all the world's Jews---regardless of their nationality---as citizens of the state. England continues to maintain a national church whose religious head is also the country's sovereign. And yet, like the Untied States, these countries are all considered democracies, not because they are secular but because they are, at least in theory, dedicated to pluralism. 

Islam has had a long commitment to religious pluralism. Muhammad's Recognition of Jews and Christians as protected peoples (dhimmi), his belief in a common divine  text from which all revealed scriptures are derived, and his dream of establishing a single, united Ummah encompassing all three faiths of Abraham were revolutionary ideas in an era in which religion literally created borders between peoples. 

It is true that the Quran does not hold the same respect for polytheistic religions as it does for monotheistic ones. However, this is a consequence of the fact that the Revelation was revealed during a protracted and bloody war with the "polytheistic" Quraysh. The truth is that the Quranic designation of "protracted peoples" was highly flexible. When Islam expanded into Iran and India, both dualist Zoroastrians and certain polytheistic Hindu sects we're designated as dhimmi. 

The current ideology of those Wahhabists who wish to return Islam to some imaginary ideals of original purity must be once and for all abandoned. Islam is and always has been a religion of diversity. Both Shiism and Sufism in all their wonderful manifestations represent trends of thought that have existed from the beginning of Islam, and both find their inspiration in the words and deeds of the Prophet. God may be One, but Islam most definitely is not. 

Any democratic society---Islamic or otherwise---dedicated to the principles of pluralism and human rights must dedicate itself to political secularization. Therein lies the Cruz of the reformist argument. An Islamic democracy is not intended to be a "theo-democracy," but a democratic system founded upon an Islamic moral framework, devoted to preserving Islamic ideals of pluralism and human rights as they were first introduced in Medina, and open to the inevitable process of political secularization. Islam may eschew secularism, but there is nothing about fundamental Islamic values that opposes the process of political secularization. 

Those who argue that a state cannot be considered Islam unless sovereignty rests I the hands of God are in effect arguing sovereignty should rest in the hands of the clergy. Because religion is, by definition, interpretation, sovereignty in a religious state would belong to those with the power to it expert religion. Yet for this very reason an Islamic democracy cannot be a religious state. Otherwise it would be an oligarchy, not a democracy.

Conclusion:

After wading through the origins and evolution of this third Abrahamic faith, established, for all practical purposes and single-handledly, by a genuinely religious-minded, illiterate, but smart and sensitive caravan leader of Arab descent, you came away with a healthy respect for the mixture of tough fair-mindedness and yet rationality and pragmatism the man had. If a human thinks he must believe in God and needs a religion as a crutch to go through life, Islam would be the most sensible answer, compared to its cousin, Christianity, and its parent, Judaism, because while it is still burdened with some unprovable and nonsensical assertions, it is more "rational", more "logical", and more "egalitarian" than the other two Abrahamic faiths. If you cannot bring yourself into believing in God and yet cannot divorce yourself from the crutch of religion, then Buddhism may be the religion that meets your needs. But don't take any words from anybody blindly. You need to investigate all available religions and faiths out there (the info is freely available on the Net) and then chose the one that makes the most sense to you. Alas, most humans don't do that. They just blindly accept whatever religion their parents practiced. Ignorance is not really bliss. It is a sign of slavery. 

To live as a human and to justify one's conduct is to really answer the questions if there's a God and what's the role of religion, if any, in your life. (To put the matter differently, to live authentically as a thinking human, and not as a mindless human animal, is to deal squarely with existential questions: where does the universe come from? is there a God? who am I? why am I here? and where am I going to end up after I die?). Other questions (fame, power, fortune, love, and sex) are of secondary importance. 

Wissai
October 23, 2013.

I wrote poetry because of thee

Yêu Em Anh Làm Thơ

Có lần em hỏi
Anh biết làm thơ
Biết tự thuở nào ?
Từ thuở mộng mơ

Thơ anh là gió
Tóc em là mây
Gió qua khung sổ
Thổi tóc mây bay

Thơ anh là mưa
Mắt em giòng sông
Mưa rơi thánh thót
Trong đôi mắt trong

Thơ anh lót gối
Cho mềm tóc mai
Trăng bên song cửa
Ru em mộng dài

Thơ anh là nắng
Tô má em hồng
Chiều nào xa vắng
Chợt nhớ chợt mong

Này cô em nhỏ
Bao giờ em hiểu ?
Anh biết làm thơ
Từ thuở yêu em

Từ thuở yêu em
Anh biết làm thơ ...

Vương Ngọc Long
 
I wrote poetry because of thee

Once thou asked me 
Since when I first wrote poetry? 
I softly said,
Since I began to dream

My poetry is the wind
Thy hair is the cloud
The wind comes through the window
And set thy hair in flight 

My poetry is the rain
The river is thy eyes
Clear rain drops fall one by one
Into the river of thy eyes

My poetry lines thy pillow 
To soften the stream of thy hair 
The moon outside the window
Lulls thee into a long dream with its lullaby 

My poetry is the sunshine
To add on thy cheeks a rouge 
And if thou art away in a certain evening
I'd be full of yearnings 

So, my dear honey baby
Now, dost thou understand?
I began writing poetry 
Since I started loving thee

Since I started loving thee 
I began writing poetry...

Translated by Wissai
October 24, 2013

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Mediocrity

a story of and about mediocrity, and dribs and drabs of drudgery

broken words and mirthless laughter,
free-floating feelings of muffled anger 
demanding a solution of some kind, 
but unsolved murder requires a pretty mind
that is not in thy possession.
so staying away is not really compassion, 
but a reflection of incompetence 
or an unripe madness.
a self-impressed woman confessed 
she wasn't impressed by people with a sense of superiority.
apparently she hasn't heard of thee
or read enough Shakespeare or tasted Wittgenstein.
sparkling bright minds always shine
like wild fires in the dead of the night.

Wissai

Today is your birthday, your second and official one. You were born twice. Not in the same meaning of the overwrought and overused phrase "born again Christian". You were born right the first time. There was no need for you to be born again, submerged in some stupid ritual bullshit to signify that you accept an illiterate, delusional, radical rabble-rouser in the Palestine as your messiah. You are too smart and too informed for that kind of bullshit. Ignorant, stupid, logic-deficient, and gullible simpletons may willingly swallow that kind of nonsense, but not you. After all, you read and study religion and philosophy. You treasure your human dignity and you possess a first-rate mind and uncommon metaphysical and emotional courage, unlike so many intellectual and emotional slaves around you, their college "degrees" notwithstanding. 

Your mother was carrying you and having contractions when the French Legionnaire troops arrived in your village, shooting at people and livestock and burning down houses. Terrified, her contractions stopped. She and your father and three elder siblings hid in the nearby canal thick with water palm trees and floating vegetation. They had to periodically submerge in water and held their breath and noiselessly came up for air. Miraculously, the invading pillaging, plundering French troops, made up largely of African mercenaries, didn't detect your family members in the canal. Your family watched their thatched hut burned down (about 16 years later, stupid American troops did the same thing with South Vietnamese peasants' houses when the troops went on a rampage looking for the VC). 

You were born seven weeks later in a hastily rebuilt, yet another thatched hut, in a late Sunday afternoon. Your mother said at the time of your birth, the river tide was coming in strong, the canal was overflowing with beige color water, the water palm trees were swaying with brisk winds, the mangy mongrel was barking furiously while your elder brother, the oldest in the family and twelve years your senior, tried to hush it in vain. You didn't arrive in this world in the midst of peace and serenity. The local midwife was the only "health professional" present in the hut, assisting with the delivery. Your father was away, visiting his relatives in the nearby village. By the time he came home, it was already dark, and you were crying your heart out because your mother, malnourished and beset of war terrors, didn't produce sufficient milk. Your mother said you came out with thick hair, long, and skinny, feisty, fussy, and crying. For the first few months of your life, you subsisted largely on the drained gruel of rice and sugar. Somehow you survived. You overcame pneumonia at the age of one and typhoid fever at eleven. Your body refused to stay down when it was down. It wanted to live, to assert itself, to make its presence known. You possessed a ferocious will to triumph over adversities, even at young age. Your parents had 14 children, only 8 made it past childhood. You were one of the stronger ones. Death was a constant visitor to your household. 

The story your mother told you about the burning down of the thatched hut of your family has stayed with you, and largely explained your antipathy to colonialism and Christianity. If one is really suffused with Christian love and charity, one doesn't go around invading other countries and burning down the huts of poor peasants. You had an impression at an early age that religion was a farce and a con game. That impression has not changed with the passage of time as your book knowledge and reasoning expand. 

From your father, you inherited the looks and respect for facts, knowledge, and logic. From your mother, you got the gambling impulses, the defiance of authorities, the pride and the arrogance, and the love for kinsmen. Your father was being trained at Teacher's College with full scholarship (room and board), but was kicked out of school in the second year after a roommate tattled on him for reading anti-French political tracts written by Vietnamese nationalists. He didn't help the situation by arguing with the French school administrator and accusing the French were invading his country. He went back to his native village in the Mekong Delta, thinking that his wealthy land-owning father would easily support him. He was wrong. His father viewed his being kicked out of school as a disgrace and a severe disappointment. A marriage was soon arranged with a young daughter of another wealthy landowner in the nearby village so that the young man would have to get out of his father's face. The young couple received some land in the bride family's estate, where the woman taught her husband how to be a farmer who heretofore only knew how to handle books, not hoes. A thatched hut was built on the bank of a canal. The erstwhile teacher-to-be turned reluctant farmer barely made enough money to support his growing family. Luckily for him, his wife adored him. She was proud of his looks and education and the connection his family had (his maternal grandmother was the daughter of a mandarin whose mother received a special proclamation from the Emperor Tự Đức. The mandarin, Bùi Văn Phong, was an attorney general and a friend of Phan Thanh Giản, former de facto viceroy in South Vietnam and Imperial Court-appointed negotiator with France). She opened a convenience-store type in the village and also baked sweets. Your parents loved each other intensely and they got by and on with life with the fruits of their labor. 

The war against the returning French troops who tried to reclaim for France her prized "possessions" in the Far East was going on in full swing. Many farmers were forcibly conscripted by the Viet communists, but your father was spared because by that time he was already having a reputation of not being normal. He liked to climb up a tree in front of his hut and stayed up there, talking to himself in French and singing songs. When he was on the ground, he would embarrass his wife by often walking into neighbors' houses uninvited and helped himself with food. In moonlit nights, he would march by himself, military style, to and fro in front of his thatched hut for hours on end, singing repeatedly La Marseillaise. Everybody in the village knew he was kicked out of school for talking back to the French administrator so his singing La Marseillaise in the thick of a communist-controlled village was further proof that he was deranged but functional. 

Anyway, you grew up with stories told by your father of how the French used the pretext of protecting the French missionaries and their Viet converts in order to conquer Vietnam, with the strange and absurd myths associated with Catholicism, and with your father's own absurdities. You discovered philosophy at the age of 15 and thought about the issues of truths, life's meaning, and mediocrity. 

You determined that life was more than just getting food on the table and having children. Any animal, any sub-human animal, can do that. Humans, on the other hand, if they have any pride, struggle and compete for superiority, power, and lasting recognition. All human dramas are played with these pursuits in mind. What sets apart the contestants is their level of honesty in playing the games of life. Real humans, not simian scumbags, must determine if there's a God that takes an interest in human affairs and to Whom humans can "pray" (read: beg, beseech, and entreat) to; must establish what they live for: themselves only or for the larger group and tribe to which they belong and of which they share common heritage; and must assess if they are mediocre, run-of-the-mill garden variety folks or they are rare, special, and endowed. 

The tragedy with most so-called humans (read: true simians and monkeys with human appearance) is that they believe in a Personal God with Whom they play a game of self-deception and make-believe; they live only for themselves; and they fancy they are not mediocre simply they have a job and save money for retirement while waiting to die and go to heaven! But from time to time, Reality interrupts their viewing of Fox "news" and sneaks into their rare moments of consciousness and self-confrontations. Reality would then tell them they are mediocre and absolute nobodies. Their lives have no impact on society as if they didn't exist at all. All they did was to pass on their own mediocrity to their offspring while they rag on and rage against the "black" President Obama. But at least Obama made history and left a distinct legacy, a real impact on people's lives: Obamacare, while his mediocre detractors left a bad smell of mediocrity and cheap hatred and envy. Obama did something very few people were able to pull it off: getting himself elected twice as the President of the United States, despite his humble beginnings. Obama decidedly and decisively was not mediocre. Just as Lincoln was remembered for abolishing slavery and preserving the Union, Lyndon Johnson for civil rights legislation, Obama will go down in history for Affordable Healthcare Act (Obamacare). 

A certain detractor of yours is decisively mediocre and very likely to die as an unknown. He's not going to leave anything behind associated with his name besides a cheap reputation as a liar, an ignorant blowhard, a shameless braggart with a pathetic command of the English language despite graduating from an English-speaking college. He had the stupid audacity of mocking your English-language poems and your rendition into English many well-known and difficult Vietnamese poems while he himself has not been able to write a single stanza of poetry. How could he write verse when he still has difficulties with prose? 

You have struggled against mediocrity all your life. You know you are not terribly smart. You couldn't understand a thing when you read Wittgenstein. Your IQ was only 135. You couldn't recognize patterns section in the IQ test. On the other hand, you also know you have a sense of aesthetics, poetic sensibilities, rich imagination, incredible memory, and a flair for languages (you can navigate comfortably in 4, and have a smattering knowledge of another 6). You have a sense of history, and wide knowledge from your reading. You can reason. And so far, as far as you know, nobody can translate from Vietnamese poems into English as well as you do. There may be 4 or 5 persons in this world who could do a better job than you do, but you don't know for sure. You have put up your translations on the Net as a challenge and as a way to find out if there is anybody out there, but so far only silence. Furthermore, you have about 10 poems written by you in English that you are very proud of. Last but not least, you have had 19 girlfriends who told you that they loved you, but only two who really did. You have no problems attracting women, even now, at the age of 64. Yes, you are full of braggadocio, but no lies. Lies are for assholes.

So, are you mediocre? Yes, in many aspects, but in some you are way superior to most monkeys you have met. The moment they open their mouths and speak, you know right away where they come from and what they are made of. You are usually not in awe of anybody, except the geniuses (Shakespeare, Nietzsche, Russell, Wittgenstein, Newton, Einstein, Hawking, etc...) and the thinkers and writers you encounter in books. Ordinary people you meet everyday bore and irritate you, except in moments they unwittingly make you laugh at their foibles and ignorance. 

On the night of your birthday, you had a strange dream. You and two others (a woman and a man) were condemned to death. All three of you were forced to drink a concoction of poison. You were told you wouldn't feel a thing. You would just pass out and that was it. You were the third person to take the drink. You watched the other two falling asleep almost instantly right in front of your eyes. Then it was your turn. A white elderly guy in white lab coat gently told you, "Have no fear. Just drink it. Sorry, but you have to do it, just like the other two. There's no escape. Don't make me wait. I don't want to call the guards in and forcibly pour the drink down your throat. Drink it like a man". With a sigh, you put the drink to your lips. Sure enough, you felt asleep. You remembered the time was about 3am. When you opened your eyes, you saw the other man was up also. The woman had turned into a kindly looking, old Christian nun, with a big silver cross hanging in front of her habit. You had a brief conversation with them:

You: Where am I? Am I still alive?
Man: Earth. Sure, you are. Me, too. And so is she (pointing to the nun).
Nun: Yes, we all are. Aren't we lucky? 
You: I don't understand. Weren't we supposed to die?
Nun: Yes, but we got a "reprieve", a second chance at life.
You: Really? I am so happy, really happy. My goodness!
Nun: The point is Roberto, you must also give people a second chance. You must not be too hard on people. And stop fixating on thinking of killing those who made you mad. Just stay away from them. That's good enough.

At that point, you woke up. The clock showed 6.27 am. The market was about to open in 3 minutes. You had slept for 3 hours, but you felt like 3 minutes. Time was relative. Despite the brevity of your sleep, you felt refreshed and recharged. You called Omar up and told him of your dream. Omar told you:

Roberto, for some people, and you are one of them, dreams are the way their consciousness, their mind was trying to communicate with itself. This dream was very important. It told you to forsake violent thoughts and embrace compassion and forgiveness in their stead. You would live longer if you do. 

Wissai
October 15, 2013

Monday, October 14, 2013

Le temps qu'il nous reste

Le temps qu'il nous reste

French lyrics sung by Nana Mouskouri 

Quelle importance le temps qu'il nous reste,
nous aurons la chance de vieillir ensemble :
au fond de tes yeux vivra ma tendresse,
au fond de mon cœur vivra ta jeunesse.

Comme une prière du temps de l'enfance
ces mots sur tes lèvres me donnent confiance.
Je nous imagine ta main dans la mienne,
nos moindres sourires voudront dire je t'aime.

Mais l'un de nous s'en ira le premier,
il fermera ses yeux à jamais
dans un tout dernier sourire.
Et l'autre en perdant la moitié de sa vie,
restera chaque jour dans la nuit.
Son cœur bien sûr battra,
mais pour qui, mais pourquoi ?

Ton pas résonne, la porte s'entrouvre,
mon cœur bat plus vite et je te retrouve.
Quand nos mains se tiennent j'oublie tout le reste,
j'ai l'impression même que le temps s'arrête.

Mais l'un de nous s'en ira le premier,
il fermera ses yeux à jamais
dans un tout dernier sourire.
Un jour l'un de nous sera trop fatigué,
s'en ira presque heureux le premier
et l'autre sans tarder viendra le retrouver.
~ ~ ~
Je nous imagine ta main dans la mienne,
nos moindres sourires voudront dire je t'aime.

See video

English Translation

The time we have left

How does it matter the time we have left,
We'll have the chance to grow old together :
My tenderness will live in the deep of your eyes,
Your youth will live in the deep of my heart.

Like a prayer from childhood,
these words on your lips give me faith.
I can imagine us, your hand in mine,
our smallest smiles will mean I love you.

But one of us will leave first,
And close his eyes forever
With a final smile.
And the other, losing half his life,
Will remain in the night every day.
His heart of course will beat,
But for whom ? But why ?

Your step sounds, the door opens,
My heart beats faster and I find you again.
When our hands are holding I forget about everything else,
I feel like time itself has stopped.

But one of us will leave first,
And close his eyes forever
With a final smile.
One day one of us will be too tired,
And, almost happy, will leave first
And the other, without delay, will follow.
~ ~ ~
I can imagine us, your hand in mine,
our smallest smiles will mean I love you.

Translated by Virginia Pickens
August 19, 2013

The time we still have

How important is the time we still have, 
we'll have the chance to grow old together :
My tenderness will live deep in your eyes,
at the bottom of my heart, your youth will reside.

Like a prayer from times of childhood,
these words on your lips give me faith.
I imagine us, your hand in mine,
we mean to say, I love you, even with our smallest smiles. 

But one of us will go first,
and forever close his eyes 
with a final smile.
And the other, losing half his life,
will remain every day in the night.
His heart, surely, will beat,
but for whom? and why?

Your step resounds, the door opens ajar,
My heart beats faster and I find you again.
When our hands together I forget about everything else,
I also feel time standing still 

But one of us will go first,
and forever close his eyes
with a final smile.
One day one of us will be too tired,
and, almost happy, will go first, 
and the other will follow without delay
in search of the other one.
~ ~ ~
I imagine us, your hand in mine,
we mean to say, I love you, even with our smallest smiles. 

Translated by
Wissai
October 14, 2013