Thursday, August 29, 2013
Meaning of my words
Sunday, August 25, 2013
A Hired Killer
Ah, hired killers. Hit men. Assassins. Unsavory characters? Cynical men without conscience or hearts?
Very few women are in this line of "work". They don't have to. They rob and kill lonely and gullible men the legal way: go straight for the men's hearts with their smiles and then sweet talks and clothes disrobed. After that, the poor bastards are helpless and open their hearts and wallets at the same time.
Please allow me to introduce my friend, Omar Sabat. Omar is his real name, he confided in me, but on the job he goes by a certain alias, depending on the circumstances. Yes, he was the same guy I mentioned in an earlier "story" of mine. He was the one who said to me, "Roberto, everybody dies. It is just a matter of when. In the overall scheme of things, in the way things are, whether you die or somebody dies now or 20 or 30 years from now, it makes no difference. We all die. Life is brief, anyway, although for some it may be unbearably long. You may as well be the one who gets paid, instead of some quack doctor, for somebody's death. If you want, I'll show you the ropes." I respectfully declined his "kind" offer because I don't have the street smarts, the cynicism, the predatory predisposition, the self-discipline, the athleticism, and the courage Omar possesses.
I don't have his looks either. Omar, 38, 6'2", devilishly good-looking and athletic, single, is a salad bowl of various genetic traits and backgrounds. Son of a Sunni Lebanese merchant father and Irish-German journalist mother. He attended American University in Beirut, graduated with double degrees in English and Electrical Engineering, fluent in Arabic, English, French and German, worked for IBM in Beirut and then in Chicago before leaving everything behind and became a member of Delta Force. He was sent to Iraq in 2003. The romance and excitement of war quickly dissipated for him. He became disenchanted with the corruption, the ineptitude of leadership, and the senseless deaths and bloodshed on both sides. He couldn't wait to find a way out. It came when he was wounded. He faked suicidal talks when he was convalescing. After a few sessions with an Army shrink, he was given a dishonorable discharge with reduced benefits which embittered him. He was employed as a math teacher in Dallas when a former Army buddy of his contacted him and talked him into working for a renegade former Delta Force colonel who was running a business of dealing with "Special Situations".
The terms hired killers, hit men, and assassins are interchangeable to the laymen, but in the business parlance, "hired killers" are at the bottom of the totem pole. They can be anybody, willing to kill for as little as $100 or some drugs. They are losers, young, addicted to drugs, starving, and often get caught. "Hit men" have a criminal, "the Mob" connotation while "assassins" refer to men in political, big business, military, spy operations. Assassins are highly professional, well paid and well respected. They are often recruited from the malcontent veterans of special branches of the armed forces. Omar is an assassin, but he is also a freelancer, willing to take on any job as long as it requires meticulous planning, daring, and hefty compensation. Omar is not only an assassin, he is also into the arts and a poker aficionado. And if his business takes him to Las Vegas, which is fairly often, he would try to squeeze poker into his schedule.
I became acquainted with Omar during one of those absurd exciting, loose, noisy poker sessions at Aria poker room in late December 2010. It was Friday night. Well-heeled tourists and amateur poker players were in town. Omar and I were at a $2-$5 no limit hold'em table. A group of four lawyers buddies from London were downing shots of Vodka diluted with water melon juice and ringed with salt, like they were going out of style. The cocktail waitress was in high heavens because the lawyers tipped well. She kept supplying them with fresh drinks. She had a big grin on her face. The lawyers were having a good time. They were loose players, especially when they were playing against one another. They talked shop, then of course, sports, politics, and then the war in Iraq. I was tuning them out and busy trying to get their money. Omar was on my right. He was a decent player, but was losing quite big to the Brits who were incredibly lucky in drawing to almost impossible odds. They high-fived and laughed hysterically when one of them won, meanwhile they kept saying "bloody" this and "bloody" that. It was annoying to Omar, evidently, because he kept breathing hard. Remarkably, he kept a stony face and said nothing while he kept going to his wallet for a rebuy of playing chips. I watched him as I watched everybody else at the table while taking in all the body language clues and verbal utterances. Several times, I tried to draw him into a conversation but got nowhere apart from the "information" that he had a Lebanese father and Irish-German mother which accounted for his unusual chiseled looks.
The Brits then talked about movies, which piqued my interest. I used to go to movies by myself, way back when I was an adolescent. Even back then, I was aware of my alienation. Movies provided a respite and refuge from it. Even back then, I was drawn to movies with a "message" and "artistic merits". Anyway, I couldn't help myself and joined the conversation. I volunteered my opinion that "Pulp Fiction" was a great, genre-setting movie and I told them why. One of the Brits objected. I held my ground. He then said the movies "Mr and Mrs Smith" was a "great" movie. I sarcastically asked him what made him think that it was "great". He hemmed and hawed and finally said because it made him feel good and he liked "assassins" movies anyway. I snorted. I couldn't help myself. I cogently told him the movie was a romantic action comedy and a far cry from realism and everything about it was fake and an exercise in mindless and cheap entertainment. Then another Brit chimed in a cheap joke, addressing to me: "Be careful, mate. This bloke here, my buddy, is an assassin. Don't make him mad because he may make a history of you." His friends all thought it was a very witty remark and they all laughed their heads off. Omar then uncharacteristically leaned over and whispered "Please say nothing more. " The way he said that startled me. The quiet, controlled, baritone voice was delivered with finality and authority. I took a good look at him and his eyes looked back straight at me and his head nodded slightly. "Yes?" He intoned once more. I nodded my head. Then all of a sudden, he announced: "I'm hungry. Are you? Let's find something to eat. My treat. Let's go, heh?" He then touched my arm. A jolt of electricity went through my body. I sensed something momentous just happened. This was not the first time that happened to me. Twice it had happened before. The first time was when I was about to be blindsided by a dude on motor bike in Saigon in 1970 at an intersection when somehow some unknown force told me to turn my head and that helped me avoid a collision at the last second. The other time happened about a year and a half later. I met an evil woman. My inner voice told me to stay away from her, but I was weak-willed and I was enslaved by my ego (she flattered me, saying I was handsome and sexy, etc.., and she was persistent). The result was that I was almost destroyed by her. It took everything I had to surmount all the obstacles and emotional mines she laid in my path. Ever since I have listened to my inner voice. It has not failed me. The voice keeps my ego in check. It has helped me to survive and resolutely stay away from evil people.
We went upstairs to a steak house. Omar exuded familiarity with luxury and fine dining. He ordered a bottle of red wine to go with the steaks. We had the whole works. Appetizers, entrées, desserts. It was a long late dinner. He did most of the talking, after posing a series of screening questions to establish that I was straight and was not an actor supreme nor a member of the police force or one of those espionage services. He then added ominously, "I don't know why I like you a lot, old man, but if you ever betray me, you and your loved ones, whoever and wherever they are, will be very sorry." Blood was draining from my face. I looked at him, speechless, and feebly nodded my head. I was normally a garrulous fellow, but at that time I was at a loss for words. I was wondering what the hell I was getting myself into because I was not the kind of guy who could keep a secret for long. As I said, Omar talked and I listened.
"Don't look so scared. I'm sorry. I want you to enjoy your dinner. Come on, I do like you a lot. I am human, like everybody else ( what's this?). And I need to talk to somebody outside of my profession, somebody normal (sic!) and understanding. That person might as well be you. I'm a good judge of character. Something in your mien and countenance, your delivery of words, told me that you are a trustworthy man. Besides, I miss my Dad ever since he died two years ago. You look like my Dad. As you probably guessed, I didn't want to hear you criticize the movie "Mr and Mrs Smith" because I am an assassin (oh my goodness!). I was in Iraq. There I killed people so some corrupt politicians over there and back home and their buddies got rich. I didn't know that at first. I thought I went there to protect my dear country against terrorism, like I was told. But that was not true. People lied to me. My buddies died to protect the rich and the powerful, not to advance democracy nor to defend it. So one day I decided that if I had to kill, that was for my benefit, and not for anybody else's. Besides, I like being the predator, not the prey; the hunter, not the hunted; the master, not the slave. I am an atheist. Atheism makes more sense in the scheme of things. God is a human invention, a figment of Man's imagination. The notion of God does not square with realities that I see with my eyes and hear with my ears. There's too much suffering and injustice for God to exist. The notion is untenable. To argue otherwise is just an exercise in sophistry.
I've been very lonely. But I cannot maintain a normal heterosexual, romantic relationship in the line of work I am doing. Do you know that the last word in "Lonesome" is "me"? I stay away from that word. So I decided that you're gonna be my friend in the normal world, my surrogate father. Now and then, I may need your help, but I will pay you for your help. I won't use you. On the other hand, if you ever need my service, just let me know, heh, hombre?
You were saying that you were full of intuition. Yes, intuition is a powerful instructor. You must learn to be attuned to it. You must listen to its instructions. Intuition is nothing but unstructured and unformalized knowledge.
For the first three years in the business, I saw a shrink. I told him I was a "corporate trouble shooter". I was in therapy because I wasn't comfortable at killing unarmed and unprepared civilians. The bastard was smart. He caught on that I was an assassin, but didn't let on until the third year and only after I baited him. After that I quit seeing him.
Since then I've done a lot of reading, trying to understand myself and the world I am in. I believe therapy is an adventure and a journey of discovery and self-discovery. Like life itself, in therapy the pleasure and meaning is in the march, not at the terminus of the march. But now I don't need a therapist to undertake the journey. I can do the poking and probing inside my head all myself. All I need is to have a right attitude. Emotional pain is the failure to accept realities and to know who you are. Now, to me, killing people for my personal profit is an adventure, a journey of discovery and a therapy. I convert chaos into order (though the target's loved ones may think that's just the opposite).To do my job properly requires infinite patience and meticulously planning. And then making lightning and decisive moves when the right time comes. No hesitation. No interference from "conscience", if I want to come out okay at the other end. A lot of my peers got killed and destroyed because of moral "weakness". I always adjust to new realities, to updated information, and I do my job with ruthless efficiency. No flair, no flamboyance, no flash, and no panache. Kissinger was right. Power is an aphrodisiac. I invariably feel powerful and sexually potent when I strike.
You've heard of the "butterfly effect", right? Some butterfly in Africa flutters its wings. One thing leads to another. And the next thing we know is that a tornado is about to touch down in the state of Kansas, right here in the middle of good old USA. Everything is connected. Why you chose to play poker? Why was I sitting next to you? Why the stupid Brits made so much noise and ruckus and then why they had to talk about assassins? You see, nothing exists alone, by itself, unconnected. Nothing is accidental. What has happened to us is preordained, a convergence of gratuitous events. I'm not saying that we have no free will, but our free will exists in a larger framework of gratuitous events. Sounds paradoxical?
Some people subscribe to a metaphysical principle---and I am getting to be one of those people with each passing day---that propounds that deep down, unconsciously, we choose everything in our life and that what happens to us is also the manifestation of our unconscious wishes, and not merely the result of our conscious desires. Bur once again, as I said earlier, our choices are not taking place in a vacuum and free of interconnection. I hope I'm making myself understood (a bit too heavy for me Omar, and I did read philosophy and psychology for fun. I just take your word for it. Whatever you say. What do you expect me to do? Disagree with you, a cold-blooded killer?)
Today I violated my own credo. I don't keep things to myself. I don't keep my own counsel. I don't know why I'm telling you all this. Perhaps that old lonely feeling again. I repeat again: you're like my surrogate father, but if you tell the authorities, I would have to kill you.
I was an engineer, a soldier, a math teacher, now a killer. I never thought that was how my life would turn out. Strange, heh? Maybe I'm telling you all of this, to a stranger, really, because I feel tired. My job involves a lot careful planning and it does tire me out mentally and emotionally from time to time. Today is the time. You asked me if I ever killed a wrong guy. Yes, twice. Wrong info was provided. I felt bad for a week each time and thought of quitting, but after careful "soul" searching, I concluded that shit happened. Like airplane crashes. And tornado touchdowns.
Time to go is time to die. It doesn't matter when and how. "
Wissai
August 24, 2013
"Another Story" and the silly, stupid comment
Another Story-I like to go to bed with strangers.-Really? Me, too.-Well, how strange are you?-Strange enough.That was how we first talked with each other, at a poker table in Bellagio Poker Room in Vegas. It was July. That means two months ago when the ambient temperature was in the 115-120 range for the whole damned month. She had a low-cut blouse almost down to her navel. She didn't wear a bra. She was on my left. Whenever she leaned forward, I and the whole table could see her enormous nipples which were bigger, I swear, than my thumbs. I was afraid I was developing a cross-eyed problem by the time the session was over because I kept glancing to my left. She must have liked my visual inspection because twice she leaned over and whispered into my ear "Enjoy the view of the pyramids?". I was red faced the first time, but I didn't say anything. But when she repeated the question the second time, I had an answer ready for her, "Yes, but I would like to know if the pyramids are for real or just an optical illusion because of silicone enhancement." That was when she came up with the follow-through that she liked to go to bed with strangers (to be continued)
Each human relates to the world in his/her own way. The Pyramid Lady uses her body to connect with men, to get their attention. She has no finesse and is coarse. But a person's inner core should not be judged on the finesse and coarseness spectrum. There are far more important criteria.True thinking is hard work. Usually it is a gift. It does not matter how persistent a dude with room temperature IQ is, he cannot understand Shakespeare nor can he grasp the notion that time and space are related and part of the broader framework. Lesser humans tend to exhibit envy, facile generalizations, and put-downs. They cannot accept the notion that they must learn to be comfortable with who they are and their limitations. They fantasize of being greater than they are. They take a bigger bite than they can chew. I despise and feel sorry for them at the same time. All they have is fucking stupid and cheap sarcasms to make them feel " smart". Little do they know any asshole can utter a sarcastic remark. Sarcasm is cheap wit.Roberto Wissai/NKBa'
Friday, August 16, 2013
Where are you now and where you think you're heading
Where are you now
That was the question you asked of yourself
More than fifty years ago
You're asking yourself the same thing now
Wow, the French were right
The more you changed, the more you remained uptight
You're back to where you were
The only thing different is you look old
Your hair gray and you're getting bald
But you're not wiser
Not at all
Two nights ago, you showed up at the airport one day late
You didn't know that until you got to the gate
It hit you then maybe you're about to get a visit from Dr. Alzheimer
This morning, the periodontist pulled out a tooth
He said solemnly, call my office if things don't go smooth
Then she called, asking about the dental visit
You replied, I feel like shit
She burst out crying, nobody loves you, she said
Not your wives, sisters, friends and mistress
Why, Why, Roberto, Why
What did you do wrong
On and on she cried
While you continued bleeding, even now.
Nietzsche once said, if you know the why, you'll come up with the how
Problem is: deep, deep down
You don't know if you want to live
A woman wrote to you that she loved you
You wrote back with a poem
But she knew she and you were just playing an Internet game
Love is easy and then it's not
It requires much more than being hot
Three am and you can't sleep
You're bleeding inside real deep
Wissai
August 16, 2013
Thursday, August 15, 2013
Notes on Humans and Language
2.. Dr. Cavalli-Sforza's genetic studies using DNA markers have indicated that Europeans are a mixed population that emerged only about 30,000 years ago and appears to have about 65% Asian ancestry and 35% African ancestry (plus or minus 8% error rate). Australian aboriginals, though they appear to look more like Africans, are genetically closer to Chinese. (ibid., p.49)
3. Christopher, 29, cannot draw simple figures, add 2 and 2 or tie his shoes. Yet he speaks 16 languages, half of them fluently, and is also a gifted translator. But his language abilities are independent of his cognitive abilities. He is not able to think about what he translates.
Carla, 22, grew up speaking Italian and English . When she began training to become a simultaneous translator, her language ability was localized on the left side of her brain. But after the training, English shifted to her right brain while her Italian remained on the left.
Study of individuals like Christopher and Carla, together with sophisticated new instruments like PET scanners have led neurophysiologists to suspect that there is not a single center for language. Some findings:
-Like the Cray computer,a person's first language is tightly organized in terms of nerve cell circuits. Second languages are more loosely organized in the brain, which is why it often takes longer to find words in them. But a knock in one part of the brain can knock out a native language and leave later- learned languages intact or vice versa.
-Different aspects of language, like proper nouns, common nouns, and regular or irregular verbs, are processed in different areas of the brain. But these areas do not send their signals to a common destination for integration. Rather, language and perhaps all cognition are governed by some as yet undiscovered mechanism that binds different brain areas together in time, not place.
-Each human appears to have a unique pattern of organization for language ability---as unique as facial features or fingerprints. Broca's and Wernicke's areas are indeed important language-processing regions in most people, but many additional language-areas are found elsewhere in the brain. Two left-brain regions called the temporal and parietal lobes are particularly rich in multiple-language areas. Each essential language area is composed of sharply defined patch of nerve cells, each about the size of a grape. The cells in each patch appear to be connected to many others located in distant parts of the brain. Different patches govern language functions such as reading, identifying the meaning of words, recalling verbs and processing the words and grammars of foreign languages. The essential areas can be thought of as "convergence zones" where the key to the combination of components of words and objects is stored. Thus knowledge of words and concepts is distributed widely throughout the brain but needs a third-party mediator---the convergence zone---to bring the knowledge together, during reactivation. The convergence zone concept explains the odd language disabilities of a stroke patient named Adam. When shown a picture of a dog, Adam can say it is man's
best friend, has four legs and barks, but he cannot summon the name for dog. Nor can he distinguish one animal from another by its name. But Adam can name man-made tools with ease. The explanation: language convergence zones for natural objects are significantly damaged, but zones for man-made objects are intact.
-The process of learning a language shapes the formation of the essential areas. From birth to the age of two, the child's brain undergoes a explosive growth of synaptic connections and is primed to learn the sounds and grammar of any language. After the age of two, language synapses that do not receive inputs from early vocalizations begin to be eliminated or suppressed, a process that continues until about age 15. (ibid., pp 134-140)
-Williams syndrome---an enigmatic birth disorder caused by the loss of one copy of the gene that makes elastin, a protein that is the chief constituent of the body's elastic fibers, and possibly by the loss of another gene or genes of unknown function that lie next to elastin on chromosome 7---characterized by enriched language and sociability skills may help solve the huge debate in cognitive psychology over the nature of language: is language special from the word go, under the control of special genes and located in special parts of the brain or does it piggyback on general mental function and intelligence? Studies involving children having Williams syndrome suggest that language is unique because there is a genetic defect that spares it (ibid., pp. 149-150).
-Brains may have separate units to digest reading and speech (ibid., pp. 155-157)
Comments/Insights/Personal Observations:
My interest in language development and foreign language acquisition has been long and tinged with a mixture of humiliation and pride. As mentioned before, my speech development was slow as a child. I was slow in learning to speak and when I finally did (as told to me by my mother), just before I turned three years of age, I couldn't articulate several speech sounds and I badly stuttered. That of course worried my mother and caused me to suffer from humiliation and anger when I was taunted and laughed at by the neighborhood kids and classmates. (The deep anger was recently rekindled when I ran into certain ignorant and stupid pontificators of Vietnamese descent, who pathetically tried to prove to me that they were smarter and more informed than me in their sputtering, error-filled, broken English despite having lived in an English-speaking environment for over 35 years). By the time I reached high school, the stuttering subsided much and the articulation problems largely disappeared. During high school years, I discovered to my delight I had no problem absorbing English and French. Still, I was painfully aware that my articulation of the speech sounds of these two languages was very poor. Nowadays I still have problems with the final /l/ articulation.
When I found myself dreaming in English I knew then I had become bilingual. Although I could navigate in French and Spanish when I have to, I know at best I am still a bilingual speaker. Knowing a language in depth takes a lifetime of dedicated study. And to be bilingual is to understand what Goethe meant when he observed that one must speak two languages to fully understand one. Learning English has helped me be more aware of the intricacies and beauty of my mother tongue.
Wissai
July 29, 2013
Em tôi ơi! tình có nghĩa gì đâu?
Sunday, August 11, 2013
Flaskbacks
Saturday, August 10, 2013
War Horse
Spoken words may or may not linger in memory, but written words, especially in the Age of Internet, last forever. So wise men refrain from writing anything that makes them appear stupid and ignorant. But, Alexander Pope, a British man of letters, remarked in his poem "An Essay in Criticism" that fools rush in where angels fear to tread, a statement that appears to have been immortalized in the English language. I am a fool so I am going out on a limb and share with you certain views.
I just finished watching the movie "War Horse". I came across it on a lark. I picked it up from the library, solely from the basis of the title. I grew up in an absurd, stupid civil war during my formative years. I watched my native country bombed to shreds by the American Air Force and my people maimed and their morals shattered. I like horses for their beauty, grace, and strength, but not enough to watch any movie about horses (I have not watched "Sea Biscuit" and "Black Stallion"). But the combination of "War" and "Horse"compelled me to pick up the DVD and examined the jacket. I finally decided to take it home. And I was glad that I did. The story was good. The directing was sensitive and faithful to the time period of the story. The pacing was right. And the acting was convincing, not laborious.
I am no movie critic. I had no formal training nor exposure to the craft of movie-making. I react to a movie on the basis of:
1) how it makes me feel about it as a work of genuine art or a clumsy, pathetic attempt of telling a story visually and suggestively, along with a hidden message, if there is any, and
2) if I learn anything from the movie--if I am transformed by it and become wiser.
That's my personal approach to movie-watching. I am not saying that it should be the way to approach a movie. But movie-watching is an experience steeped in reactions to visual, audio, and thematic presentations. The reactions may be a bit slower to those involved in listening music where the immediacy of sound arrangement makes the listener react to a piece of music at a visceral, not analytic, level. We either like or don't like right away a piece of music when we listen to it.
Because of the accessibility of "understanding" a movie and a piece of music, every Dick, Tom, or Harry fancies he can be a movie critic or a music critic or, heavens forbid, both, and thus won't hesitate to pontificate on the merits and demerits of a movie or a piece of music when he himself has no training nor exposure to the process of making these works of art. He then extrapolates and extends his pontifications to other arts like painting, architecture, sculpture, or literature. I personally know a nitwit who does not know crap about literature, who cannot write a single stanza of poetry in any language, but he stupidly and obstinately maintains that he can dispense comments about poetry. When questioned about his lack of familiarity with the craft of poetry writing, he gamely and blithely answered that he did not have to be a musician to appreciate music or a cook to enjoy good food. He, of course, was very proud of his answer. Little did he know that his answer exposed further his pathetic ignorance and pitiful personality. Not all arts are the same and requiring the same level of cognition and appreciation. Some arts are more accessible than others. Poetry is an art that requires from the reader a modicum of poetic sensibilities, a sensitivity to sound, music, and meanings, and a love for words. Poetry is always at a higher level of cognition and appreciation than prose because of its compactness and suggestibility. Everybody can write prose--- with some training, but poets are born, not trained. One does not say, okay today I decided to be a poet. One writes poetry because one has to. There is no other way. Words, arranged in a certain rhythm and sometimes rhyme, are a better tool for him to express himself about certain subjects than mere prose. A poem comes to him from deep somewhere in his subconscious and demands expression. Any fool can enjoy and pontificate about a good meal and a glass of fine wine, but that does not mean he possesses a sense of aesthetics about the arts of cooking and wine making. It just means that his palate is not impaired. A pig can consume food with a gusto, but I seriously doubt that it has any sense of aesthetics about gourmet cooking.
To conclude, it took me more than 40 years to be able to render into English the following stanza written by Hồ Dzếnh:
"Em cứ hẹn nhưng em đừng đến nhé!
Ðể lòng buồn tôi dạo khắp trong sân
Ngó trên tay, thuốc lá cháy lụi dần…
Tôi nói khẽ: Gớm, làm sao nhớ thế?..."
"Go ahead, make a date with me, but don't bother to show up!
So in sorrow, I'd walk around in the courtyard,
Watching the cigarette burning itself backwards on my finger tips...
And softly saying to myself: 'Damn! I do miss her much.."
One of these days, I will translate the rest of the poem.
Wissai
August 6, 2013
Thursday, August 8, 2013
Is Life fair or Unfair?
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
The Turbulent Universe by Paul Kurtz
Foreword
Somebody once said to me with a smile---although I would swear it was more like a sneer, okay, a sneering smile then---and a rich baritone voice while placing his hand on my shoulder in an avuncular manner "Roberto, mi querido, I suggest you get out of Dodge quickly. Say, like tomorrow. There's a funeral pending if you elect to stay.¿ Entiendes?" . I looked at his eyes, my throat went dry, my knees went weak, and a slight tremor involuntarily went through my body. I was frightened and mad at the same time. Words came out of my mouth with difficulty, "Sí...Sí...Sí...". I then turned around and walked out of his office like a drunkard who had been bar hopping all night.
Since that meeting, my world has been turbulent. Conflicting feelings about honor and survival have been raging inside me. So last week when my eyes fell upon the book "The Turbulent Universe" on a bookshelf in the library, I grabbed it without thinking. I came home and tried to digest it by taking notes while reading. The following are mostly verbatim notes taken from the book. The notes at the end are of most relevance to the perpetual war inside me.
Notes
Wishful thinking: Christian and Muslim belief, scientifically uncorroborated, in salvation after death and transportation to a heavenly abode.
Earlier in the 20th century, analytic philosophers agreed with Wittgenstein's view that philosophy was not one of the natural sciences and that its main task was the "logical clarification of language." Today many analytic philosophers are prepared to go beyond this to a naturalized epistemology based on science.
Logician-philosopher Q.V. Quinn's naturalism:
- "the recognition that it is within science itself, and not in some prior philosophy, that reality is to be identified and described."
-no metaphysical truths independent of science
-all scientific knowledge is empirical
Physicalist reductionism:
Reality at root is basically physical (or physical-chemical). All other entities, such as gods, spirits, souls, minds, consciousness, do not exist as independent entities. (p. 93)
Kurtz thinks physicalism is traditional materialism. He thinks the above statement is not "scientific" in a full sense, because it has not been verified experimentally.
Murray Gell-Mann, the co-discoverer of the quark, thinks that nature involves more than physics and chemistry and the four forces of gravity, electromagnetism, strong force (binding quarks together in clusters to make subatomic particles, neutrons, and protons), and weak force (responsible for some nuclear phenomena such as bets decay and radioactivity). We need to make allowance for chance events in the history of any heavenly body. In regard to Earth, it would include natural selection and evolution. Specifically, he says that life on Earth involves more than just physics and chemistry. It involves the emergence of new levels. "Life," he says, "can perfectly well emerge from the laws of physics plus accidents , and mind, and neurobiology" (p. 85). He further says that although the "reduction" of one level of organization to a previous one is possible in principle, it is not by itself an adequate strategy for understanding nature. New laws and new phenomena appear, and need to be accounted for in their own terms.
Kurtz thinks the best illustration of the limits of reductionism is in biology. E.O. Wilson maintains that there are two fundamental laws of biology: "The first is that all the known properties of lifer are obedient to the laws of physics and chemistry....(The second law says that) all biological processes and all the differences that distinguish species have evolved by natural selection." He illustrates this by reference this to the division of cells, which, he says, are "emergents." "They arise from the interactions of the molecules." And, he says, "the movements cannot be readily deduced from principles of physics and chemistry." (p.86)
The closest relation between biology and the physical sciences is DNA, the molecule that encodes heredity. This has given birth to molecular biology and cellular biology, beyond which is the rest of biological research. This includes the principles of natural selection, where we have seen that many macro factors are included: differential reproduction, mutations, adaptations, the struggles for a survival of species, and more. Evolution involves changes of a species through time, and this involves meticulously discovering and arranging fossils and bones in sequences of descent. Paleontology is thus related to evolutionary biology. Although genetic mutations occur, understanding these is insufficient for understanding the competition between males in an effort to mate with females of a species, or the selective role of females in choosing mates, and these factors do not relate to micro events on the level of particles. Nor do physics and chemistry help scientists to understand the decline of biodiversity and the extinction of species.
Over and beyond this is the examination within organismic biology of the functions and networks of the organs of the body on the level of homeostasis, and similarly, in dealing with the invasion of the body by pathogens or of threats from the external world. Nor do particle physics and chemistry enable us to understand how ecosystem exist in nature. There are higher-order qualities that emerge---psychological phenomena, such as "consciousness" and "mind," for example---which cannot ipso facto easily be reduced to neurological states of energy, though they do not exist separate and distinct from them. There are still other newer fields of medicine that have emerged, such as epidemiology and immunology. Whether these in toto can be deduced from the laws of physics and chemistry still remain to be seen. Thus we may conclude that physicalist reductionism is mistaken, and that some form of nonreductive naturalism seems a more appropriate account of the contingent-random universe in which we live.
Historicity
An essential source of understanding anything in nature is knowledge of history.
Change over time involves two kinds of explanations: first, the origin or beginning of an object or event, person or country; second, ther process by which each changed, was developed, grew, and was modified, or, conversely, how it fell apart and was destroyed.
Natural sciences also deal with historicity and individuation. They attempt to understand the origins and historical changes in the planets and moons in our solar system. Thus, the history of the planets and their relationship to the Sun and also to the entire solar system within the Milky Way and its relationship to other galaxies in the universe is essential if we are to understand nature. Similar applications apply in the biosphere in understanding our natural selection operates in explaining the evolutionary descent of species.
All of these considerations (historicity and individuation) apply as well to human affairs, where historical reconstructions of individuals, communities, nation-states, cultures, and civilizations are especially relevant. It is to this area of inquiry that we now turn.
Contingency and Conflict in Human Affairs:
-"Bad" versus "Good":
The view of Man, by nature, as nasty, brutish, and self-seeking is outlined by Thrasymachus in Book I of The Republic.
Socrates disagreed with this view of human nature, and in the rest of The Republic to elaborate n ethical theory that allows the idea of the good, justice, and beauty to serve as beacons for the life of reason and justice.
-Humans are androgynous (on a bell curve) and thus it is not possible to draw sharp line between male and female in terms of behavior.
-Moderating forces on emotions:
*Reason
*Social conditioning
*Same-sex bonding (team spirit) (pp 151-152)
-Factors that led to the collapse of civilizations:
*Overpopulation
*Climate changes
*Invaders with superior technology
*For Jared Diamond, geography is a key factor in ther supremacy of a civilization: location, climate, natural resources (fresh water, fertile soil, potential food supply, minerals) and whether it is located in coastal regions so it can engage in commerce and trade.
*Karl Marx maintained that the economic forces and relationships of production were the basic causal factors in social change.
According to this interpretation, the political , religious, moral, intellectual, and cultural characteristics of a society are part of the "superstructure"and are a result of the economic base. The economic fundamentals include the key role of the relationships of production---the way society is organized to produce and distribute goods and services. Marx also postulated the surplus theory of value in the form of wages, rent, interest, or profits. He said that although human labor power provides value, it was not equitably distributed. This class analysis overstated the role of classes in causality, for factors in the so-called superstructure---may at times supersede economic causes. Nevertheless, the Marxist emphasis on economic causes is a powerful insight in explaining societies of the past.
* Actually there are many causal factors at work in the rise or decline of societies or civilizations: contingent events in history, role of "impact-making" individuals (Genghis Khan, St. Paul, Muhammad, Mao), innovative technological discoveries, and ideologies
Moral Choices in a Random Universe
-Coevolution:
Human cultural heritage is added to Homo sapiens' biogenetic endowment. The biological framework of a species is transmitted by genes. The sociocultural traditions are conveyed by memes: the patterns of belief and practice adopted in a society and transmitted to future generations. What are considered to be the proper modes of conduct are enforced by priests, warriors, teachers, and through social rulers.
-Role of Individuals:
Sidney Hook in "Hero in History "pointed out that many decisive historical events were due to charismatic individuals who used the power of the state to fulfill their ambitious, sometimes idiosyncratic goals, and not because of of underlying historical causes and trends (p. 195).
-Freedom of Choice:
There is an emergent property within an argument and inquiry on the level of human discourse that cannot be reduced simply by the suspicion that there must be hidden and ultimate causes for all psychological behavior---including the process of argument and inquiry. An argument is an argument. It is not simply a set of neurological firings, and a scientific (or philosophical) inquiry is an inquiry that goes on involving persons, writings, publications, discussions, and controversies,which cannot be reduced ipso facto to the physicalist atomic hypothesis, because these are epistemological criteria, principles or inferences, standards of confirmation and corroboration, which have their own internal integrity and rationale, as understood by logicians, scientists, and ordinary of common sense. And the attempt to explain them away by insisting that there must be some underlying cause(s) for human choice and that a person does not make up his mind freely is sheer nonsense.
Choices are caused and conditioned by a whole range of contingencies, but nonetheless it is the person who makes a choice, and this act of choosing is a form of behavior of a human being, including his body, brain, and nervous system. We are held responsible for our choices, and in many cases we can be persuaded or convinced to change our choices in the light of reasons or evidence on the level of cognitive and emotive behavior.
Human beings can learn from experience. They can change the way they behave (within limits). We are not blind automata, simply responding to hidden stimuli and acting in the light of conditioned responses.
Granted, what we often decide to do as individuals depends on our propensities and habits. Who or what we are is a result of a wide range of social and environmental forces that have conditioned us. Moreover, a person's genetic tendencies and ingrained psychological passions are so powerful that it often requires tremendous efforts to resist them. Our choices are constrained or impelled by these basic causes. On the other hand, we are occasionally able to act contrary to our deep-seated psycho-bio-social personality traits and proclivities. We can respond to arguments and be persuaded by reasons,and we can act contrary to what is normally expected. We can master our destiny, provided we do not live in a rigid society that constrains freedom of choice.
Where there is choice, there is still some measure of freedom. "Soft" as distinct from"hard" determinism affirms that the behaviors of human beings, including their decisions, are conditioned by a wide range of causal factors on many levels---genetic, biological, psychogenic, and sociogenic---yet freedom of choice is a creative dimension of human behavior, and it can and does add something to the equation of human behaviors. Hard determinism is akin to a religious faith, worshipped at the altar of hidden causes. It is contrary to who and what we are as resolute and responsible human beings. It is also a false doctrine promoted by malevolent fools who wish to control other people's behavior.
Wissai
August 7, 2013
Nabokov and Wilson, Wissai and the Nitwit
Throughout the years, I have kept referring to the exchange between Nabokov and Wilson which I came across in a book more than 35 years ago. The book also listed the exchange between Ionesco and British theater critic Kenneth Tynan. Unfortunately, I misplaced the book and forgot the title. What I have are the indelible memories tinged with an ineffable pleasure associated with reading the exchanges. The point the book made was that the critics (Wilson and Tynan) were inferior to the writers they criticized. They are at best a footnote in literary history while Nabokov and Ionesco are literary giants and their names are likely to live for a long time, if not forever.
In the second decade of the 21st century, a nitwit whose constipating, stuttering, sputtering, error-laden, factually deficient, logic-prose in English has always been a source of endless hilarity to me whenever he pens his puerile, jejune "thoughts". However, this ignorant imbecile has had a galling audacity to advance a "thesis" that I couldn't translate Vietnamese poems into English while he himself has never been able to produce a single stanza of poem in either Vietnamese or English despite my repeated challenges. His ridiculous "thesis" brought to my mind the above-mentioned exchanges. I just found Nabokov's reply to his "critic" from the Internet. Note the devastating and withering contempt that Nabokov had for Wilson, couched in beautiful English. I have a similar contempt for the nitwit.
Wissai
To the Editors:
As Mr. Wilson so justly proclaims in the beginning of “The Strange Case of Pushkin and Nabokov,” we are indeed old friends. I fully share “the warm affection sometimes chilled by exasperation” that he says he feels for me. In the 1940s, during my first decade in America, he was most kind to me in various matters, not necessarily pertaining to his profession. I have always been grateful to him for the tact he showed in refraining from reviewing any of my novels. We have had many exhilarating talks, have exchanged many frank letters. A patient confidant of his long and hopeless infatuation with the Russian language, I have always done my best to explain to him his mistakes of pronunciation, grammar, and interpretation. As late as 1957, at one of our last meetings, we both realized with amused dismay that despite my frequent comments on Russian prosody, he still could not scan Russian verse. Upon being challenged to read Eugene Onegin aloud, he started to do this with great gusto, garbling every second word and turning Pushkin’s iambic line into a kind of spastic anapaest with a lot of jaw-twisting haws and rather endearing little barks that utterly jumbled the rhythm and soon had us both in stitches.
In the present case, however, things have gone a little too far. I greatly regret that Mr. Wilson did not consult me about his perplexities (as he used to do in the past) instead of lurching into print in such a state of glossological disarray. Some time later I plan to publish a complete account of the bizarre views on the art of translation which have been expressed by some critics of my work on Pushkin. Mr. Wilson’s article in The New York Review of Books of July 15, 1965, will then receive all the friendly attention it deserves. The main object of this preliminary note is to undeceive credulous readers who might assume that Mr. Wilson is an expert in Russian linguistics. Here are some of the ghastly blunders he makes in his piece.
1. “Why,” asks Mr. Wilson, “should [Nabokov] call the word netu ‘an old-fashioned and dialect form’ of net. It is in constant colloquial use and what I find one usually gets for an answer when one asks for some book in the Soviet bookstore in New York.”
Mr. Wilson mistakes the common colloquial netu, which means “there is not,” “we do not have it,” etc., for the obsolete netu which he has never heard and which, as I explain in my note, is a form of net in the sense of “not so” (the opposite of “yes”). If Mr. Wilson had continued “All right, but can you get me that book?” and if the shopman had replied “netu” instead of net, only then would my friend’s attempt to enlighten me be not as ludicrous as it is now.
2. “The character…called and pronounced yo—but more like ‘yaw’ than as [N.] says like the ‘yo‘ in ‘yonder’….”
I do not think Mr. Wilson should try to teach me how to pronounce this or any other Russian vowel. The “yaw” sound he suggests is grotesque and quite wrong. It might render, perhaps, the German-Swiss affirmative (“yawyaw”) but has nothing to do with the Russian “yo” pronounced, I repeat, as in “yonder.” I can hear Mr. Wilson (whose accent in Russian I know so well) asking that bookseller forMyawrtvïe Dushi instead of the correct Myortvïe Dushi (Dead Souls).
3. “Vse and vsyo, the former of which is ‘all’ applied to people and the latter ‘all’ applied to things.”
This is a meaningless pronouncement. Vse is merely the plural of ves‘ (masculine),vsya (feminine) and vsyo (neuter). Examples: vse veshchi, “all things,” vse lyudi, “all men,” vsyo naselenie, “all the population”; vse hlopayut, “all applaud,” vsyo hlopaet, “all the audience applauds.” Eto vse ego oshibki? “Are these all his mistakes?” Net, ne vse, “No, not all.”
4. “Pushkin is always shifting these stresses [i.e., “the main stresses in the often so long Russian words”].”
Pushkin does nothing of the kind. We have in Russian a few words that can be, or could be in Pushkin’s day, accented in two different ways, but this has nothing to do with prosody. The “always shifting” is a pathetic, but quite nonsensical, grumble.
5. “What does [N.] mean when he speaks of Pushkin’s ‘addiction to stuss’? This is not an English word, and if he means the Hebrew word for nonsense which has been absorbed into German, it ought to be italicized and capitalized. But even on this assumption it hardly makes sense….”
This is Mr. Wilson’s nonsense, not mine. “Stuss” is the English name of a card game which I discuss at length in my notes on Pushkin’s addiction to gambling. Mr. Wilson should have consulted my notes (and Webster’s dictionary) more carefully.
6. “His poor horse sniffing the snow, attempting a trot, plods through it.”
This is Mr. Wilson showing me how to translate properly ego loshadka, sneg pochuya, pletyotsya rïs’yu kak-nibud‘ (which in my correct literal rendering goes “his naggy, having sensed the snow, shambles at something like a trot”). Mr. Wilson’s version, besides being a gross mistranslation, is an example of careless English. If, however, we resist the unfair temptation of imagining the horse plodding through its own trot (which is rather what Mr. Wilson is trying to do here), and have it plod through the snow, we obtain the inept picture of an unfortunate beast of burden laboriously working its way through that snow, whereas in reality Pushkin’s lines celebrate relief, not effort! The new snow under the sleigh facilitates the horse’s progress and is especially welcome after a long snowless autumn of muddy ruts and reluctant cartwheels.
7. “That [i.e. N.’s translation ‘having sensed’] would be pochuyav, not pochuya[which Mr. Wilson thinks should then be ‘sensing’]. Where is our [i.e., N.’s] scrupulous literalness?”
Right here. Mr. Wilson is unaware that despite the different endings, pochuyav andpochuya happen to be interchangeable, both being past gerunds and both meaning exactly the same thing (“having sensed”). Compare zametiv and zametya, which both mean “having noticed,” or uvidev and uvidya, which both mean “upon seeing.”
Let me stop here. I suggest that Mr. Wilson’s didactic purpose is defeated by the presence of such errors (and there are many more to be listed later), as it is also by the strange tone of his article. Its mixture of pompous aplomb and peevish ignorance is certainly not conducive to a sensible discussion of Pushkin’s language and mine.
Vladimir Nabokov
Montreux, Switzerland
Edmund Wilson replies:
In reply to Mr. Nabokov’s courteous letter, I must acknowledge two errors. I should have said that vsyo was the neuter nominative singular and vse the nominative plural for all three genders, and I ought to have found out that the present gerund may be used in the sense of the past. I think that it is just as well that Mr. Nabokov should be able to tax me with these mistakes, for, in rereading my article, I felt that it sounded more damaging than I had meant it to be, and this has given him a chance to score. As for netu, all the examples given in Dahl seem to be of the current colloquial sense—it seems to be a contraction of netut, “not here”; the Slovar’ Yazyka Pushkina, on the other hand, makes the distinction between this meaning and the one that Nabokov notes. The line between the two is evidently very fine, and in view of the fact that Nabokov is avowedly writing for English-speaking readers interested in Russian, who are likely to have heard the current netu, he might well have explained this difference.
I am glad to be enlightened about stuss, a word which is not included in the O.E.D.(I never use Webster), and I am sorry to have missed the account of it in connection with Pushkin’s gambling, but my attention, as I read the commentary, did occasionally flag a little. Mr. Nabokov misunderstands my statement that Pushkin’s main stresses are “always shifting.” This was not, as he says, a “grumble,” and I did not mean that the same word was always being stressed in different ways. I meant that, in Pushkin’s poetry, the main stresses come at different points in different lines. It was Mr. Nabokov himself who called my attention to this phenomenon. It is, in fact, the main subject of his appendix on prosody, where he tries to show that this principle is also dominant in English verse. He also misunderstands my criticism of his guide to pronunciation. I am not, of course, “trying to teach him” how to pronounce the Russian vowels but complaining of his attempt to describe them in terms of English. It has occurred to me since I wrote, that, in words like lot and not, the English have a vowel sound which we do not, something between our short o and aw, and that Mr. Nabokov’s reason for thinking that stressed Russian φ is the same as the first o in cosmos and that ë sounds like yo in yonder is due to his pronouncing these words in this way; but I am confirmed in my impression that these two sounds are not the same by a professional English linguist who specializes in Russian. In any case, Nabokov’s present advice is quite at variance with that of his book on Gogol, in which he tells us with equal assurance that the name is to be pronounced “Gaw-gol”. I might add that I have found no one who agrees with him that t and d with the soft sign “sound somewhat like ts and dz.” (He says nothing about the soft sign after terminal r in such a word as tsar‘, which, in this connection, is the foreigner’s chief problem.) I am told that this ts effect is a feature of Byelo-Russian. Now, I have heard Mr. Nabokov insist on the superiority of the Petersburg pronunciation to that of Moscow, and I am rather surprised to find him recommending the pronunciation of Minsk.
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Ngập ngừng and English Translation
Tác giả: Hồ Dzếnh
Em cứ hẹn nhưng em đừng đến nhé!
Ðể lòng buồn tôi dạo khắp trong sân
Ngó trên tay, thuốc lá cháy lụi dần…
Tôi nói khẽ: Gớm, làm sao nhớ thế?
Em cứ hẹn nhưng em đừng đến nhé!
Em tôi ơi! tình có nghĩa gì đâu?
Nếu là không lưu luyến buổi sơ đầu?
Thuở ân ái mong manh như nắng lụa
Hoa bướm ngập ngừng cỏ cây lần lữa
Hẹn ngày mai mùa đến sẽ vui tươi
Chỉ ngày mai mới đẹp, ngày mai thôi!
Em cứ hẹn nhưng em đừng đến nhé!
Tôi sẽ trách – cố nhiên, nhưng rất nhẹ
Nếu trót đi, em hãy gắng quay về…
Tình mất vui khi đã vẹn câu thề
Ðời chỉ đẹp những khi còn dang dở
Thư viết đừng xong, thuyền trôi chớ đỗ
Cho nghìn sau… lơ lửng… với nghìn xưa…
Hesitation
By Hồ Dzếnh
Go ahead, make a date with me, but don't bother to show up!
So in sorrow, I'd walk around in the courtyard,
Watching the cigarette burning itself backwards on my finger tips...
And softly saying to myself: 'Damn! I do miss her much.."
Go ahead, make a date with me, but don't bother to show up!
My Baby! what does love really mean?
If not the lingering moments when we first met?
The love-making sessions as tenuous as silk in sunshine
As tentative as when flowers hesitatingly greet butterflies
So we make a date for tomorrow when the season is happy ever more
Only tomorrow is beautiful, only tomorrow!
Go ahead, make a date with me, but don't bother to show up!
I will complain---of course, but only very lightly
If you already left, please try to come back...
Love would love its potency if promises are fulfilled
Life is only beautiful when it is unfinished
Let letters half written and boats keep drifting without docking
For a thousand years...that follow the thousand years before...
Translated by
Wissai
August 6, 2013
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Words That You Have Writen
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Be careful where you are going.
Have you heard of the Chinese proverb, the one that says, “if you continue the road you’re on, you will get to where you’re headed?” I suppose it’s the same as we in the West say, “be careful what you wish for because you may get it. ”Voilà, we have here an indisputable case of East meeting West, don’t you think? Say, “yes, yes, yes.”
See, it wasn’t so difficult to say so, was it?
I have written about me and you in “story” after “story”, “essay” after “essay”. The tone is sad, bleak, dreary, negative, and depressing. There are no cheerful notes. In my writings, people are nasty, brutish, and ugly. They are vain, ignorant, and dumb. The way I look at the human species, there are only three groupings: the ones who deceive others, the ones who deceive themselves, and the ones who realize the first two are not quite human and in fact should be lumped together with the lower animals.
Of course, I regarded myself as a member of the third grouping. I also happened to think that to see things in full light one had to live through darkness first. So I haunted the libraries, walked the streets, made friends with the homeless and that was among whom I met her, standing in line for free coffee and donuts in one frigid early January morning in front of the Catholic Mission on Washington Street in North Las Vegas.
She was white, but everything on her was black. The hair, the hat, the scarf, the coat, the jeans, the purse, the shoes. She stood out in white blinding sunshine of winter morning in the long line of drab, gray, brown, motley crowd. I stood behind her. She was reading a book. Curious, I asked her what she was reading. Silently and with a touch of disdain, she showed me the book’s cover. It was “Ecce Homo” in English translation, a work I had read several times, and I told her so. And we started talking.
-Why a nice lady like you doing here?-First, how do you know I am nice? Second, my standing here is none of your business. You’re my father or something? What’s about you? You don’t look homeless and desperate for handouts. Why are you here?-Wow, touche’ and touchy at the same time. Very good (from experience, you must soften them first with flattery. All women, especially the young ones, think that they’re both tough and sensitive, that they’re bitches with a heart). Lady, I just make conversation. It’s not everyday occurrence that I run into a sharply dressed, nice looking young lady with a liking for Nietzsche, standing in line in front of the Mission. I just feel excited and gloriously happy that I met you. You are right. I am not homeless, at least not yet (I burst out chuckling). I’m here for yes, a free stale donut and a coffee, but also to get a taste of standing in line and observing my brothers struggling with survival and dignify.-Cut out the crap. You’re here for the freebies, and none of the sociological and anthropological bullshit. You’re taking away food that belongs to more deserving people. Shame on you! Go away! Get lost!By that time, several brothers of mine told her to shut up, that she had no right to speak to me like that, that there were plenty of donated stale donouts and cheap coffee for everyone, including her. I told them she was just kidding, testing the boundary, feeling me out. One of them said, “yeah, honey, I want to feel you, right now”. I quickly inserted myself between her and him, and firmly but gently told him to take things easy. Luckily for me, a security guard showed up and told everyone to behave and keep quiet, otherwise he had to eject the offenders from the line.
I expectedly that she would march out of the line in a huff, but she didn’t. She was back to reading her book. I kept my mouth shut, feeling amused. I was not offended by her rudeness. She was angry for some reason, very likely not caused by me. I had not done anything wrong, not really. I left her alone until we got to the table upon which were placed boxes of donuts and containers of coffee. She took one glazed donut, a coffee with neither sugar nor cream, and coolly proceeded to sit down at a long table to enjoy her breakfast. I came over to the table, gave her a piece of paper, and said, “excuse me once again, I hate to bother you, but if you change your mind, here’s my cell number, I would love to hear from you. You have a good day now. Bye. Very nice meeting you.”
I walked into the bright sunshine. My senses were on fire. I was aflame with a clear realization life was more often than not a series of serendipities and chance occurrences, and I must be ready, unappeasably ready, for them. I couldn’t afford to have an emotional shutout; I must not mislay any claim to moral distance. But at all times, however, I must maintain a solid grip on, not a phantasmagorical sense of, reality, as I had seen so many weak-minded folks do. I had a strange and excited feeling that she would call me. Not right away, but she would. At the same time, if she didn’t, I still felt happy, momentarily and gloriously happy, simply I ran into her, a reader of Nietzsche. I could not tell you how many times the book she was holding in her hands, and whose words she was taking in, had sustained me and helped me pass through many difficult nights.
I walked two blocks east and got on the bus to take me south to the Strip where most of Vegas’ swank casinos are located. Being Saturday, Las Vegas Boulevard’s sidewalks were already filled with tourists who looked happy like kids in the Disneyland. Yes, Vegas is the playground for grown-ups to seek fun, excitement, vicarious thrills and adventures via money. Some have the stupid audacity to dream that they may score big and their lives will change for the better. Like moths to flame, people with rocks in their brains and lust in their loins flock to this Mecca of sex, drugs, gambling, foods and drinks, and excellent night clubs and shows.
I walked into Aria Casino, a centerpiece of an avant-garde architectural and allegedly futuristic urban agglomeration of condos, hotels, shopping malls and art galleries. I headed for the poker room, my hunting ground for fun-seeking tourists. These well-heeled folks helped me supplement my income and maintain my middle class cognomen.
Poker attracts all kinds of players who think they are smart and can think People who like to take risks and love excitement also flock to the game. So at the poker table, a wide range of humanity assemble and duke it out for supremacy. Only the best hand wins. Coming in consistently at second place at showdowns is a financial disaster and a blow to one conception’s of oneself. There is no other human adventure where a man’s true nature is laid bare for him and others to see. It is an activity where lying to others is acceptable but lying to oneself is disastrous. Poker, properly played and managed, can be a good builder of character, not counting bankroll.
Poker has exerted on the imagination of the public and has its own myths and mythos. It can be played as a recreational game, a gambling pursuit, or as a deadly mind contact sport where honor, fortune or bantrupcy are at stake. It is a social equalizer. At the poker table, the social status doesn’t mean diddly shit; neither does money because if one plays poorly in a gambling way without a good grasp of mathematical probability, the nature of luck (good and bad), understanding of the human mind regarding courage, saving face, pain threshold, self-control, and money management, the money would not last and will migrate to those who initially had less money.
I left the poker room about 5 pm, a few hundred dollars more in my wallet than when I came in. As I was heading out to the bus stop to get back to my condo, I experienced a feeling of small triumph and conquest, a slightly drunken state of being a winner, an affirmation of my self-conception that I was indeed better and smarter than most folks who waged a mental contest with me. I knew my place in the world. I was not greedy. I didn’t play at the level where the losses would cripple me financially and send me in a downward trajectory to being a permanent street inhabitant. A man must know his limitations and be comfortable as to who he is. It’s not so much the monkeys and assholes think who I am as who I think I am. I am the one who determines what my reality is, no matter what the fucking yahoos and stupid ignoramuses, the ones who constantly lie to save their ugly faces, “think”. Faced with incontrovertible evidence and arguments that they are ignorant and stupid, instead of accepting the facts and truths, they resort to more lyings and cheap insinuations in order to cover up their ignorance and their stupidity. To me, they are fucking and fucked-up animals deserving to be exterminated like vermin. Yet, ironically they talk about and harp on shame and dignity as if they possessed them in abundance. They think the people around them are too stupid to know of their true nature. I have solid reasons to lump those assholes and motherfuckers in the same category of animals. I know how certain individuals in history viewed them—the mental, emotional and intellectual weaklings who fancied that they were humans, who believed in prayers and in a personal “God” who “listened” to their entreaties. As I said before, those who deceive others and themselves are not fit to be considered humans. To be human is to face facts and truths, not to run away from them and then hide behind fictions like God, heaven, afterlife, and reincarnation. To run away from facts and truths is to act like a coward. Acting like a coward is to be a coward. Our actions determine who we are, not what we say who we are. Words mean nothing. Anybody who can speak can say whatever they want. What matters is we must back up our words with concrete actions, not with more words.
The sun was going down as I was waiting for the bus. Winds were picking up; scraps of torn porn ads fluttered and swirled on the sidewalk near the bus stop. The sky was covered with long stripes of rust, orange and purple in the west. Bright city lights and neon signs were on. The day was cooling rapidly. I felt chilled. I stood up and shuffled my feet and raised my arms up and down to elevate the body heat. I looked ridiculous but I didn’t give a fuck. I never cared much for public opinion.
After I got home, I changed into gym clothes and went downstairs to the exercise room in my building. I went through the routine of stretching and weight training for about 30 minutes and then headed to the nearby swimming pool. I swam for about an hour in a leisurely manner, letting my mind drift to wherever it wanted to go. I thought of the girl in black, wondering if she would ever call, of the assholes and my plans for them, of the necessity of taciturnity, of my new physique.
When I got back to my condo, I checked the phone and was mildly disappointed that there was no call from her. In fact, there was no call from anybody, not that I received many calls anyway. Apart from my spouse, sisters, and son, nobody else called me except the once-a-month from CVS for anti-cholesterol medicine refill, phone marketers ( I really felt sorry for them. A tough way to make a living. I wondered how constant rejection would affect their psyche), head hunters, escort service recruiters, and late night callers from the Lonely Heart Club.
I didn’t go back to the Catholic Mission to check if she would be there. I was prideful. Pride was something I had plenty of. It both hurt and helped me. I had a big ego. I fancied that I was superior to 98% of the humans on this planet especially when it came to philosophy, thinking, logic, and intellectual courage. So I walked around feeling both superior and humble at the same time. I was a walking contradictions. There were constant wars inside me. There were no integration, no resolution, no harmony, no peace. Only constant churning and chaos. I was a primordial soup of restless creation.
She held out for ten days. By that time, I already gave up on her and started having an eye on the Somalian neighbor who just moved in a few days before. I normally did not care for ladies of dark complexion, but somehow I was partial to women from Ethiopia and Somalia. To me, these women were darkly attractive for being tall and having finely chiseled facial features and voluptuous bodies.
The call came in exactly at midnight. I almost didn’t pick it up. I was asleep. But in the end, curiosity got the better of me after looking at the unfamiliar Vegas number on the cell phone screen. A female voice was on.
-Hi, we met while standing in line for donuts. You gave me your number. Are you still up?-Oh, hi there (I had the presence of mind to raise my voice a bit for enthusiasm though I was annoyed at the ungodly hour). Yes, I remember. How are you?-Not too good. That was why I called. Can you talk?-Of course! Certainly! ( I am trying hard to work up the enthusiasm. There are times you’ve got to stoop to conquer. Fuck Pride for now. I just have to sleep late to make up for lost time). What’s going on?-I don’t know. I need somebody to talk to ( Jesus! You have nobody else? Why me? Why at this hour? You must be really sick).-I’m all ears. What’s your name?-Angie. And yours?- Roberto is my name. Listening is my game. Shoot!-I want to tell you I felt bad after you left. I was rude and that was uncalled for.-That’s all right. Don’t worry about it. You certainly must have had a bad day.-Yes, I did. But I shouldn’t have taken it out on you. I apologize.-That’s okay. Really. How’s the book? Did you finish it?-Yes, I’m now into “Twilight of the Idols”.-Excellent choice. It and “Ecce Homo” are the more accessible among Nietzshe’s works . Now please tell me why you’re reading Nietzsche. You must have already read his most famous, “Thus Spake Zarathustra”.-Yes, I have. It is like poetry in prose. Somebody told me to get stronger, I must read Nietzsche.-Are you getting stronger?-Yeah, but….-But what, may I ask?- A long story.-You don’t have to tell me if you don’t want to. We just met.-Some other time.-Fine with me (with young women, you shouldn’t be pushy, not right away. Good things come to those who wait).I was not surprised at what she said next. It was not my first rodeo with young women.
-I know it’s late (now you’re telling me!) Could we continue the conversation another time?-Sure, whenever you like, Angie. Should I call you or…-It’d be better if I call, if it’s all right with you. Good night.-Sleep tight. And please take good care of yourself.Then I clicked off my cell with a smile on my face. I was in the driver’s seat. I knew it, but I wondered if she knew it, too. Regardless, it made no difference to me if she called back. I was not smitten by her (she was aggressively rude, not really my cup of tea). It was Nietzsche’s book that intrigued me. I soon slept tight, with no noticeable dreams to recall, straight through to the next morning when the sun almost got quite high in the sky as I parted the bedroom window curtain upon waking up. Spring Mountain was to my west, covered with snow in the summit. Downtown was to the left of me. And the south was where planes were landing and taking off into the azure, cloudless winter sky. I loved Vegas in the winter. Cool, crisp, and invigorating during the day. And great sleeping weather at night.
I took the shower, got dressed, then called the poker room at Aria to reserve a seat. I had the feeling I would have another wining session. Life was good. I put the Chinese vocabulary book into my backpack and rode the elevator down to the street level.
In the following four weeks, Angie would call me intermittently at all and odd hours and always at night to discuss Nietzsche, Hemingway, Wolven, philosophy, and literature. She never once asked me to call her. I didn’t really care. I liked the game enough to see how it worked out. Besides, nothing delighted me as much as having a youngster who seemed to defer to me when I held court. It was not so much vanity as the all-too-human need to communicate and share my thoughts.
I spoke at length about things and issues and subjects that have bothered me a great deal.
I told her God was a necessary fiction for most people, especially the weak, the ignorant, and the stupid. I pointed out to her the important role of philosophy insofar as truths, knowledge, and values are concerned. Most monkeys and assholes love power, but they fail to see because of their ignorance in matters of philosophy, they let the so-called religious and other thinkers have power over them in making them what and how to think. Values like money, power, fame, prestige, morals, and public opinion don’t mean shit to the one who really knows how to think and to live his short alloted life on this planet. That’s where Nietzsche comes in handy. The dude had so many insights on so many things and he expressed them in a pithy and concise and yet so poetic way that one couldn’t help but be staggered by them. A few examples would be sufficient in illustrating the true power of thoughts:
-It’s hard to live with men because silence is difficult. I pointed out to Angie that I was a mere lad of 18 when I came across this powerful statement, and I always remember it when I run into stupid assholes and ignorant scumbags who ironically love to pontificate on matters they don’t have a fucking clue.
-If you look into the abyss long enough, it will look back at you.
-When we figure out the why, we will come up with the how to live.
-What does not kill me, will make me stronger (everybody heard about this comforting thought).
-Don’t die before your time. Die a timely death.
I urged her to read short stories written by Hemingway and Scott Wolven where the issue of grace under pressure and the subject of courage and cowardice were examined. I told her we are what we read, not what we say we are. Words, in particular lying words, are cheap and mean nothing. Nobody believes them, except the liars who lie to themselves.
As time went on, she stopped dropping wisecracks to my outpouring of thoughts and feelings. I would even venture a bold observation that she listened spellbound. The issue of timely death apparently fascinated her. She kept steering our conversations toward the subject. Then one night, out of the blue, lightning struck and thunder boomed. I felt that I had to pose a question: “You are not thinking of killing yourself or somebody, are you?”
She said nothing to my inquiry. She just clicked the phone off. I should have called her back there and then, but I didn’t. I was not in love with her. To me, she was just an one-person audience upon whom I unloaded my thoughts which were filling my cranium to the brim.
Then three days later, in another gorgeous, sun-drenched, beautiful winter Saturday morning exactly 6 weeks after we had met, she cheerfully called me up and asked me out on a date that very morning! She had never called me during the day. She asked me where I lived and then told me to be out in front of my building in 45 minutes. “Dress nice, but not too nice,” she added.
I put on my black outfit: jeans and dress black shirt over a black T-shirt, my jade amulet with black chain dangling over the T-shirt, black loafers with black socks. Unsurprisingly, my lady in black arrived in the same outfit I first saw her 6 weeks prior.
She drove a black Lexus, and stopped abruptly in front of the condo building with a squealing of brakes that made me jump. I approached the car and hardly got in the front passenger seat when she took off like a bat out of hell. I promptly fastened the seat belt, nervous like shit, but trying to be cool. I said, “you must love speed. Are you on speed, my dear”. ‘Fuck yes! want some?”. “Hell no!”, I quickly replied. “Where we are going?” “My place”. Surprised once more, I looked at her. Despite make-up, she looked rather pale and thinner than before. Didn’t I mention she looked in her early 30′s and quite attractive? I must also say I loved her dressing in black. She looked stylish, alluring and captivating.
She lived in Turnberry Condo on Karen Avenue, a block east of the Vegas Strip, not far at all from where I lived. I could walk from my place to hers within 45 minutes. Her unit was on the 22nd floor, facing west, affording a breath-taking view of West Vegas. Compared to her unit, mine was cheap.
“Make yourself at home. The drinks are in the fridge. Take whatever you want. Lunch should be ready in about an hour.”
I was normally a chatter box and was not above posing prying questions, but with her I was being discreet and circumspect. The only personal question I had put to her was my wondering regarding her fascination with timely death, which prompted her rude clicking off the phone and staying away from me for three days. Now her sudden turn-around of being extra-friendly should be a perfect excuse for me to make inquiry about her personal life, but I refrained from doing so. I willed myself in maintaining an emotional distance from her and letting her dictate the terms and nature of our relationship. She was a mystery. I normally didn’t care for things which were mysterious, but with her I made an exception, maybe I didn’t really know what and how she thought of me. I was a married man for a long time even though I had a serial quasi-romantic relationships with women of all ages. My heart was a lonely, sad hunter. Through pains, hurts, and disappointments, I had learned that women were a dangerous, cunning, manipulative, ruthless species and should be approached with utmost care, especially for a person at my age. There was no bigger fool than an old fool.
I didn’t take anything out of the fridge. I just took a tour of the condo after asking her if it was okay to do so. She said cheerfully, “Go ahead, sweetie, I told you, ‘make yourself at home’”.
In the living room, on the credenza there were pictures of her and her parents. On the wall hung two photos of nature: one color of sunset, one black and white of wintry scene. Books and CDs and DVD movies on the bookshelf. Books on sociology, history, and philosophy; CDs heavy on folk rock; movies were actions and thrillers, no comedies. I noticed a bottle of Bordeaux being chilled in a stainless bucket of ice, a small vase of freshly cut red roses, and two settings for two on the dining table off the kitchen. Sound of bubbling brook wafted from the speakers on the wall.
I asked her if I could be of any help in the kitchen. She laughed and told me to relax and that everything was taken care of.
We started with mixed green salad, cumber, red onions, burgundy olives and roman tomato in oil and red vinegar. Then we proceeded to New York medium rare steak, sautéed in garlic butter, and a side dish of baby carrots and baked potatoes topped with sour cream and chives. I did most of the drinking. We indulged in freshly baked apple à la mode for dessert.
We ate slowly and it was she who did most of the prying. I told her of my vocation (insurance underwriting which elicited a delight from her and a disclosure that she used to be a claims adjuster for Farmers Insurance and her father was a big shot in the company headquarters in Los Angeles. When I asked her what she was doing now, she just wryly smiled and said, “later”) and avocation (language learning, poetry, and poker). The subject of poker fascinated her. She wondered if I was a gambler and an addict. I assured her that I was not.
-Angie, I take risks, calculated risks, but I am not a gambler, definitely not. I don’t want to be like those homeless guys we saw standing in front of the Mission a few weeks ago.-But do you make money, though? Enough to be worth your while?-No, I just make chump change to supplement my income. Poker is an outlet for me to be sociable, meeting people. Besides, it is a good character builder. To win, I must understand the human mind and exercise emotional control over myself.She then told me she saw me standing at a bus stop one day and wanted to stop and give me a lift, but she didn’t because she didn’t want to give me a wrong idea. I chuckled and said,
-I dare not have a wrong idea about you or anybody. I know myself and my place in this world. I don’t have an inflated sense of self as most assholes and scumbags and motherfuckers I have met in my lousy life.-Whoa, I touched on a raw nerve, didn’t I?-Not really, I read philosophy and what’s the point of acquiring a discipline in thinking and reasoning and ending up being blind as to who I am.-So, you’re saying that you have not been attracted to me?-No, no, no, I am not saying that, not at all. But be realistic, you are young, very attractive, and apparently a person of means. I am assuming you own this nice condo which easily could fetch mid six figures or higher, even in today’s market. I am a late middle-aged man. Some even say I am an old man (which prompted a protest, “No, no, you don’t look your age. Not at all. You could easily pass for 50) , live in a rented condo, and don’t even have a car.-But you can have a car if you want, right? You can afford one, right?-Sure, I can, but public transportation in this town is excellent. And if I need to get somewhere for a few days, I just rent a car from HotWire Deals, at really reasonable rates. I am a simple man and I live a life of simplicity.-No, you are no simple man.I helped her with the dishes. Then we retired to the living room and did more talking. She was never married. Nobody would measure up to her, nobody would be near her father in ability. She then said I looked like her father in several ways: the smile, the laughter, and the intensity of feelings, the passions! She then asked about my spouse and all the women that went through my life with the kind of utmost seriousness that compelled me to answer her inquiries in detail, warts and all. As she was listening to whatever my love life was, she kept saying, “poor Roberto” (Yeah, yeah, woe was me). Then she complained of being tired and sleepy. I took it as a hint for me to get lost, so I stood up and said thanks for the nice meal and the wonderful time I had. But as I headed to the door, she said, “Please stay.” Surprised, I stood in my track and came back to her, “Are you sure?” I breathlessly asked. She stood up from the couch, took my hand, and said, “Definitely! Let’s take a nap together.” I then told her before I did that, there was one thing I had to do, “What’s that? Calling somebody for permission or asking God for forgiveness?”. ”Wrong on both counts. If it’s not much a bother, I need to brush my teeth after a meal and I wonder if you have a spare toothbrush.”
She slept like a proverbial baby, snuggling close to me. I did not. I just closed my eyes and told myself that I was dreaming while listening to her intermittent snoring. We didn’t have sex because I was too nervous and mystified. She was certainly sexy enough.
When she woke up, the sun was going down. She went to the bathroom and when she came back, she was bald. Then she said, melodramatically of course, that time for more real talk.
“I’m having cancer. Very serious stuff. It’s spreading. I’m tired of the treatment. It makes me sick. It drains my Dad’s money. I want to die, on my own terms. I’m my father’s only child, very spoiled. My mother died of the same thing. Dad remarried shortly thereafter. I don’t care for his wife who’s a bitch. I’m sure she’s real happy at my dying. She couldn’t wait. All the inheritance money due to me would go to her, I suppose, assuming they stay married. Dad loves the bitch, though. I care about you. Thank you so much for listening to me and being patient with me and for sharing your knowledge of Nietzsche, Hemingway, and Wolven with me. The last few weeks have meant a lot to me. I was stronger and less scared and less lonely because of you. I really wish I were not sick. I really wish I had met you sooner. But that’s life. Full of ironies. I have money but don’t have a long life, but the homeless people have no money and they seem to live forever. I went to the Mission to see, taste and smell the ironies of life. Why did you go there ? (Angie, almost the same reason as yours, to appreciate the light, I need to experience darkness). Today is the last time we met. I am going to LA to be near my father. I told him about you. He asked to say hello. Movers will come tomorrow morning. I’m donating almost all my stuff to Goodwill. Please, I have something for you. I want you to keep them as reminders of me. Come!”
She took my hand and let me to the dressers, pulled out a drawer, and took out a box, gift wrapped. Then she said, “let me drive you home” and would not take no for an answer when I told her I could walk home. We were both silent during the short drive. She drove much more slowly this time. At the driveway in front of my building, she leaned over and gave me a long strong kiss. She then said, “Be strong, my friend. Take good care of yourself. I love you!” I cried. She did not. And she drove away, without looking back, without pressing the horn. Those were the last words I heard from her.
I staggered inside and rode the elevator up to my unit in stupor and bewilderment. I opened the door and collapsed in the couch in the living room. The Strip was lit up, like a Christmas tree, as usual. Far out west and up high, stars were out in full force. I looked at the box which was now lying next to me. I shook it up. It made some strange, muffled voice. I gasped and tears welled up in my eyes when I opened it. “Ecce Homo” on top, then two bundles of cash, each was tied with a bank sticker saying $10,000, and then all sorts of rings and bracelets. I took out my cell phone and dialed, but she didn’t pick it up. I left her a message, “Angie, you’re an angel of mine. Thanks so much for caring”. I looked at the weather beaten “Ecce Homo”, opened it and on the first page were the words, “To my friend and my teacher. I wish we met sooner. Love, Angie.”
Life was full of ironies, all right. First, Harriet. Now, Angie. The only two women, besides my own mother, who really cared about me, both died soon after I met them. Sixteen days after our only meeting and lunch date, a letter bearing a postmark from LA arrived in the mail. I looked at the return address. It said Roberto Sanchez, 2222 Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills. I opened the letter.
“Dear Mr. Ngo,
With much sorrow and regret and a broken heart, I thought I should let you know that my daughter was no longer in this world. She talked about you all the time. Thanks for being there for her during the most difficult time of her life. Per her instructions and insistence, attached is the title to her car which has been assigned to you. Please contact me…”
I stopped reading. And my heart stopped feeling lonely. And I felt peace. Somebody cared, at last.
Roberto WissaiApril 24, 2013